Search for: "BLACK v. MAY." Results 1121 - 1140 of 7,551
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2014, 7:54 am
The answer is yes, according to Lord Justice Kitchin for the Court of Appeal in Specsavers & ors v Asda Stores [2014] EWCA Civ1294. [read post]
15 May 2023, 12:56 pm by Jeff Welty
Black suggests that it must be something substantial, not what lawyers like to call a mere peppercorn. [read post]
7 Oct 2024, 9:06 am by Marcel Pemsel
Subject matter of the dispute The judges clarified that it cannot take the limitation of Väderstad’s trade marks into account because the Court may not annul or alter the BoA’s decisions on grounds, which come into existence subsequent to their adoption. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 9:53 pm by Edward A. Fallone
Today the Wisconsin Supreme Court issued its opinion in the case of Black v. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 2:40 pm
I’m reposting what I wrote in May in advance of today’s opinion by the Court. [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 11:28 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
" (Para 33).There is no determination here as determination signifies expressive opinion, as per Law Lexicon and Black's Law Dictionary. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 12:35 pm by Leila Rafei
Learn more about the case:https://www.aclu.org/cases/bert-v-oconnor Stay informed about our workSign up [read post]