Search for: "Billings v. United States"
Results 1121 - 1140
of 10,142
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2014, 5:35 am
California and United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2015, 9:26 pm
The Supreme Court recently observed this challenge to patent claim interpretation, stating in Nautilus, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 11:47 am
"And in precisely two months from today, the Epic Games v. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 6:18 am
Yesterday Senate Democrats were unable to break a Republican filibuster on the DISCLOSE Act, a legislative response to the Court’s recent decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 5:01 am
Another 25 state legislatures have considered (or are currently debating) similar bills with varying levels of intensity. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 1:29 pm
Holly Hill Fruit Prods., 75 F.2d 13, 15 (5th Cir. 1935); see United Drug Co. v. [read post]
21 May 2011, 10:24 am
In a case that applied the 2010 United States Supreme Court decision in Padilla v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 10:20 am
United States (motion to amend complaint, tribe as indispensable party)* State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2014state.htmlCases featured: In re Jayden D. and Dayten J. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:34 pm
This reflects the current law as stated in Chase v News Group Newspapers ([2002] EWCA Civ 1772). [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 9:42 am
United States (Tribal Sovereign Immunity; Indian Leasing) Newtok Village v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 11:22 am
In a unanimous ruling issued today, the United States Supreme Court upheld a whistleblower’s claim in Universal Health Services v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 5:00 am
Wade and Dred Scott v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 12:20 am
See Shadwick v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 2:55 pm
* United States Federal Trial Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/dct/currentdct.htmSt. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 6:21 am
Baby Girl, United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 8:00 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 1:26 pm
The New York state Senate failed to pass a law in 2009, despite support of the bill from the then-Governor.The new Marriage Equality statute has religious exemptions, which were also hard-fought, and several otherwise conservative state senators who voted for the bill specifically referenced the “protections” for religious entities contained in the law, and absent from the previous bill. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 5:08 pm
"UT Austin's Consideration of Race in Admissions is Narrow, Necessary and Constitutional": The University of Texas at Austin today issued a news release that begins, "Today, the University of Texas at Austin filed its brief to the United States Supreme Court as respondent in the case of Fisher v. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
United States, makes that point only then to go on and draw the distinction. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 12:57 pm
By Aida V. [read post]
