Search for: "Birth v. Birth" Results 1121 - 1140 of 7,187
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2020, 4:26 am by SHG
The case arose as the result of several lesbian couples who conceived via artificial insemination; Indiana refused to list birth mothers’ wives on their children’s official birth certificates, but regularly listed birth mothers’ husbands on birth certificates without additional requirement. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 7:10 am by Joy Waltemath
Lastly, the court found that a genuine issue of fact existed as to whether the employee resigned to continue to care for her newborn child or was instead terminated (Basri v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 6:01 am by Bob Ambrogi
ROSS Intelligence, a company that sought to innovate legal research through the use of artificial intelligence, and that helped to raise awareness of AI throughout the legal industry, is shutting down its operations, as a lawsuit against it by Thomson Reuters has crippled its ability to raise new financing or explore potential acquisition and left it without sufficient funds to operate. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 5:01 am by Eve Gaumond
” To be constitutionally valid, a limitation on freedom of expression has to be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society following the four-step test from R v. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 8:00 am by Alexis
The guilty verdict was appealed to the Supreme Court in the case Miranda v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
”One of the questions that came up when Judge Bork was testifying at his hearing had to do with the right of married couples to use contraceptives, as established in Griswold v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 12:02 pm by Patricia Hughes
Now we have Ontario (Attorney General) v. [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 1:05 pm by Kalvis Golde
He promoted abolitionist causes until his death, 52 years before the court cemented slavery’s place in our antebellum Constitution in Dred Scott v. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Dupate v Latvia ([2020] ECHR 819) the Fifth Section of the European Court of Human Rights held that the publication of covertly taken photographs of the partner of a politician leaving hospital with her newborn baby was a violation of her Article 8 rights. [read post]