Search for: "Bui v. State" Results 1121 - 1140 of 9,837
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2021, 7:58 am by Stewart Baker
It may be a first for our podcast to reference Marbury v. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 6:20 am by John Jascob
By Anne Sherry, J.D.In a forcefully stated keynote address to the SEC Regulation Outside the United States conference in London, Enforcement Director Gurbir Grewal insisted that the SEC does not “regulate by enforcement” when it applies longstanding regulations to new and emerging technologies and products. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 5:06 pm by Stewart Baker
It may be a first for our podcast to reference Marbury v. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 5:06 pm by Stewart Baker
It may be a first for our podcast to reference Marbury v. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 11:26 am by Emily Dai
Matthew Tokson analyzed federal and state judgments applying Carpenter v. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 11:28 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  For example, if State A is home to one percent of all U.S. citizens, the tax must collect one percent of all revenues from State A. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 2:57 am by Peter Mahler
In most states, the merger statutes granting appraisal remedies to dissenting equity owners and the judicial dissolution statutes authorizing buyouts dictate the use not of the FMV standard but, rather, the legislative construct known as the fair value (FV) standard. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 9:00 pm by Kyle Persaud
HB 2674 clarifies that an individual must be 21 years of age or older to buy, possess, or receive nicotine products. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 9:00 pm by Kyle Persaud
HB 2674 clarifies that an individual must be 21 years of age or older to buy, possess, or receive nicotine products. [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 9:26 pm by David Kopel
Supreme Court on the Second Amendment to right to bear arms, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 8:57 am by Eugene Volokh
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit heard oral argument in one such case, Gun Owners of America, Inc. v. [read post]