Search for: "Burwell v. Burwell"
Results 1121 - 1140
of 1,519
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2015, 9:05 pm
Burwell: next ObamaCare showdown at Supreme Court [Ilya Shapiro and Josh Blackman, David Bernstein on Cato brief, Adler v. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 2:19 pm
[Chronicle of Higher Education] * The government's brief in King v. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 4:25 am
Burwell, in which the Court will consider whether tax subsidies are available for individuals who purchase their health insurance on an exchange established by the federal government. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 4:00 pm
Burwell. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 4:56 am
” The Court also granted review in OBB Personenverkehr AG v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 6:10 pm
Burwell subsidy litigation (recall that oral arguments are scheduled for March 4). [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 3:11 pm
What is notable, however, is that Justice Ginsburg (joined by Justice Sotomayor) wrote a two-line concurring opinion, which reads: Unlike the exemption this Court approved in Burwell v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 9:00 pm
Hobbs opinion, authored by Justice Samuel Alito (the very same author of Burwell v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 9:00 pm
Hobbs opinion, authored by Justice Samuel Alito (the very same author of Burwell v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 7:19 pm
As regular readers know, the Supreme Court in King is set to decide whether Obamacare subsidies for policies procured from exchanges are only available when the exchange was “established by a state,” as the plain text of the law says, or whether they are also available for state exchanges established by the federal government, as the Obama Administration, via Treasury Department regulations written by the IRS, has concluded. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 4:20 pm
Burwell and Wheaton College v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 2:26 pm
" Burwell v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 11:39 am
It’s an interesting case, but it drew even more attention because of the close parallels to last year’s high-profile decision in Burwell v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 10:59 am
Burwell v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 7:00 am
And no doubt the answer to this is still a work in porgress, as the panel's discussion of Burwell v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 4:07 am
Jacobs covers last week’s grant in Horne v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 6:04 am
Holder and Horne v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 8:00 am
“The Supreme Court will hear the King v. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 4:46 am
In Jesinoski v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 2:54 am
Commentary on King v. [read post]
