Search for: "Bury v. State"
Results 1121 - 1140
of 1,466
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2011, 1:26 pm
Gaitis Last week’s United States Supreme Court decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 10:03 am
A win for the plutocracy* Yesterday’s decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 3:51 pm
By Eric Goldman Stebbins v. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 8:05 pm
” Judge Major then ordered six of Qualcomm’s lawyers to be referred to the State Bar of California for investigation of their ethical violations and possible discipline. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 9:59 am
Yesterday’s infuriating opinion by SCOTUS in the Westboro Baptist Church case (Snyder v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 3:22 pm
Then there was KSR v. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
The respondent's skeleton argument cites in support of that proposition R v Gloucestershire County Council ex p Barry [1997] AC 584, esp at 604E-F and 605 (Lord Nicholls), R v East Sussex County Council ex p Tandy [1997] AC 714, esp at 747B (Lord Browne-Wilkinson), and Ali v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39, at [4] -[6] (Lord Hope). [57] And finally, Bury v Gibbons was a case in which the Authority had simply ignored a request for an oral… [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
The respondent's skeleton argument cites in support of that proposition R v Gloucestershire County Council ex p Barry [1997] AC 584, esp at 604E-F and 605 (Lord Nicholls), R v East Sussex County Council ex p Tandy [1997] AC 714, esp at 747B (Lord Browne-Wilkinson), and Ali v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39, at [4] -[6] (Lord Hope). [57] And finally, Bury v Gibbons was a case in which the Authority had simply ignored a request for an oral… [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 5:04 am
Both writers argued in favour of the new single publication rule, which would bury the 160 year old common law authority, Duke of Brunswick v Harmer, that is the basis for the legal interpretation of every download of an online article as a new publication. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 6:23 am
In post-9/11 decisions, the Sixth Circuit and , in Rusmfeld v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 4:30 am
Hanff states:"TrustE carried out an experiment to measure the effectiveness of the (US Do-Not_track) icon. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 1:27 pm
A Frye hearing gets its name from Frye v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 11:35 am
Orcutt’s First Law states that “Before things get better, they must get much worse. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 5:34 pm
” Lee v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 10:07 am
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Deputy Commissioner David V. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 9:01 am
Such was the case in Madonado v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 5:41 pm
Similarly, in Printz v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 3:25 am
See Figueiredo-Torres v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 3:14 am
The Supreme Court's decision in Snyder v. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 7:02 pm
Even more interesting is the fact that the organizers of these events have ownership interests in several legal cases that have come before the Supreme Court, most recently Citizens United v. [read post]
