Search for: "California v. United States" Results 1121 - 1140 of 12,634
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2013, 12:11 pm by Robert B. Milligan
By Robert Milligan and Grace Chuchla Using a forum selection clause to transfer a case out of California federal court may have become easier thanks to a recent order from Judge Koh of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 3:33 pm by James Goodman
California Emergency Physicians Medical Group; Med America; Mark Alderdice; Robert Buscho, United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (No. 12-16514) (April 8, 2015). [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 5:30 am by Andrei Gribakov
But could a single state secure a GDPR adequacy determination even though the United States has not obtained a full adequacy decision? [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 5:38 am
In its dismissal of Berg's complaint, the trial court relied on a decision by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California interpreting California law.  [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 5:38 am
 In its dismissal of Berg's complaint, the trial court relied on a decision by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California interpreting California law. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 5:35 am by Amy Howe
California and United States v. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 4:30 am
In a recent decision, a District Court in California declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Japanese law claims; thus, assuring the other countries of the world that they need not fear that the United States is the Shangri–La of class-action litigation for lawyers representing those allegedly cheated in foreign securities markets. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 4:30 am
In a recent decision, a District Court in California declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Japanese law claims in a case; thus, assuring the other countries of the world that they need not fear that the United States is the Shangri–La of class action litigation for lawyers representing those allegedly cheated in foreign securities markets. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 2:41 pm by John Bellinger
  The brief argues that “The uncertain threat of litigation in United States courts, especially for conduct with no significant connection to the United States, could therefore discourage foreign commercial enterprises from establishing channels for their distribution of goods and services in the United States, or otherwise making investments in the United States. [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 6:34 am
The United States Supreme Court, too, has recognized the pivotal role of state tort actions “as a complementary form of drug regulation” with respect to drug labeling. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 8:00 am by The Docket Navigator
Here, the allegedly infringing products that are ordered by foreign customers were manufactured outside the United States, and distributed to customers outside of the United States. [read post]