Search for: "City of New York v. United States" Results 1121 - 1140 of 4,082
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2013, 8:09 am by Sandra C. Fava
  Two women were legally married in Ontario, Canada but resided in New York City. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 10:53 am by Mark Cooke, ACLU of Washington
Again relying on the state constitution, the Washington Supreme Court unanimously ruled (in York v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Chase,” will be delivered on December 5 by James Oakes, Distinguished Professor of History at the Graduate Center of the City University of New York. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 11:33 am
'" It said "the literal interpretation of the concept of public use which the petitioners urge us to apply was abandoned long before the United States Supreme Court concluded [in Kelo v City of New London (545 US 469 [2005])] that the use of eminent domain to carry out an economic development plan does not violate the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution.. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 12:32 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Our offices are conveniently located throughout New York City and we offer free consultations. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 10:57 am by Danielle Citron
Today, March 24, is the centennial of the date on which the New York Court of Appeals issued its opinion in Ives v. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 7:53 am by Kaufman Dolowich Voluck
Zigelman (L) is the co-managing partner of the New York City office of Kaufman Dolowich & Voluck, LLP and chair of its General Liability Coverage Practice Group. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 6:30 am by Jane Chong
Reiterating the Court’s conclusion in its earlier landmark case, New York v. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Supreme Court granted Plaintiff’s employer’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, which order was affirmed by the Appellate Division in Bayer v City of New York, 60 AD3d 713.Plaintiff subsequently filed another action in Supreme Court, this time alleging age discrimination and the creation of a hostile work environment in violation of Executive Law §296. [read post]