Search for: "Company Doe v. Public Citizen" Results 1121 - 1140 of 2,017
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2014, 5:54 pm
What light does the “history” referred to by the Citizens United dissent shed on the “text” and the Framers’ “purpose”? [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 11:27 am by Deepak Gupta
  (Disclosure: Public Citizen, along with several other consumer groups, joined an amicus brief in this case authored by the Center for Responsible Lending.) [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am by Bernard Bell
Public Company Accounting Oversight Bd., 561 U.S. 477, 505 (2010)). [read post]
5 May 2015, 12:01 pm
The use of cell phones is ubiquitous now and some citizens may want to stop telephone companies from compiling cell tower location data or from producing it to the government. [read post]
2 Aug 2009, 11:35 pm
And if Michigan does, I suspect other states do, as well. [read post]
17 May 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
  In Percoco, the Court held that a private citizen does not owe the public a duty to provide honest services simply because he has strong influence over government decisions, again abrogating contrary Second Circuit precedent. [read post]
14 May 2013, 2:36 pm by John Elwood
FMR LLC12-3Issue: Whether an employee of a privately held contractor or subcontractor of a public company is protected from retaliation by Section 806 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, 18 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 5:51 am by Robert Kreisman
The panel noted that the company has no offices in Illinois, no employees in Illinois, is not registered to do business in Illinois, and does not advertise within it borders. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 4:38 am
On Tuesday, December 5, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Rockwell International v. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 9:20 am
This is a plea in public law and grounded to the public international architecture of the post 1945 world. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 5:08 am by Susan Landau
The Snowden disclosures sowed great distrust among the public toward the NSA. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 11:16 am by Eric Goldman
Here, the court doesn’t see it that way: First, SB 419 is not a generally applicable law like the one in Arcara, which authorized the closure of any building found to be a public health nuisance. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 8:47 am by Eric Goldman
If that’s the law, it will be functionally impossible to publish videos without the consent of every person depicted–a nonsensical standard in the age of citizen journalism and widespread video documentation of public activities. #3: Cybersecurity Breaches. [read post]
27 Nov 2006, 6:25 am
She, too, insisted that "if a drug company defrauds the public and puts a dangerous drug on the market, the company must be held accountable—end of story. [read post]