Search for: "Creditors Collection Services" Results 1121 - 1140 of 2,179
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2014, 11:24 am
In its simplest form these definitions and border-drawing exercises determine extent of the law determines the borders of the sorts of undertakings to which a lawyer will be asked to provide services for clients. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 3:14 pm by Alan S. Kaplinsky
In addition to requiring payment of the refunds and the $50,000 penalty, the Consent Order prohibits USA Discounters from engaging in the challenged practices, offering the performance for a fee of any SCRA-related service involving a RIC for which USA Discounters is a creditor or assignee, and accepting any payment in exchange for the performance of any such service. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 12:21 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Playing that out here, it may just be standard for defendants who are protected even by a harm rule to remind courts/courts to remind readers of the reasons for that rule--§230 couldn’t be more explicit that it sacrifices the interests of some people who are indeed harmed to the greater service of protecting “the internet,” and courts and defendants nonetheless remind us all the time of the good purposes Congress had. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 4:00 am by Amy Salyzyn
As Malcolm Mercer has argued in his recent Slaw column: “If we cannot find ways to effectively have regulated lawyers, paralegals or alternative providers deliver legal services in some areas, there can be no justification for prohibiting anyone but licensees from servicing those areas. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 8:13 am by Richard J. Andreano, Jr.
  That exemption provision, for open-end credit, states that a periodic statement need not be sent for an account if: (i) the creditor deems it uncollectible, (ii) delinquency collection proceedings have been instituted, (iii) the creditor has charged off the account in accordance with loan-loss provisions and will not charge any additional fees or interest on the account, or (iv) furnishing the statement would violate federal law. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 11:34 am by Law Lady
RUSSELL, Respondent. 2nd District.Estates -- Claims -- Timeliness -- Claims filed beyond three-month creditors' claim period set forth in statute were time-barred, even assuming claimant was a known or reasonably ascertainable creditor who was not served with a copy of notice to creditors -- Where a personal representative has failed to serve a copy of notice to creditors on a known or reasonably ascertainable creditor, creditor's… [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 7:40 am by admin
The creditor must also, within that one-year period, serve process on the personal representative of the estate by way of in-hand service, service accepted by the personal representative, or filing a Notice of Claim with the Register of Probate. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 10:20 am by D. Daxton White
Bracey solicited investors, including some customers from his firm, to invest and collectively purchase a block of series A shares from that third-party issuer in the amount of $103,200. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 10:46 am
Nigro had provided his cell phone number to the company when he called to shut off the service of his deceased mother in law's account. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 12:23 pm by Blue Blog
  Thus, the Subcontractor was limited to pursuing collection of its payment as an unsecured creditor. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 12:23 pm by Blue Blog
  Thus, the Subcontractor was limited to pursuing collection of its payment as an unsecured creditor. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 12:23 pm by Blue Blog
  Thus, the Subcontractor was limited to pursuing collection of its payment as an unsecured creditor. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 12:23 pm by Blue Blog
  Thus, the Subcontractor was limited to pursuing collection of its payment as an unsecured creditor. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 12:23 pm by Blue Blog
  Thus, the Subcontractor was limited to pursuing collection of its payment as an unsecured creditor. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 12:23 pm by Blue Blog
  Thus, the Subcontractor was limited to pursuing collection of its payment as an unsecured creditor. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 12:23 pm by Blue Blog
  Thus, the Subcontractor was limited to pursuing collection of its payment as an unsecured creditor. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 12:23 pm by Blue Blog
  Thus, the Subcontractor was limited to pursuing collection of its payment as an unsecured creditor. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 12:23 pm by Blue Blog
  Thus, the Subcontractor was limited to pursuing collection of its payment as an unsecured creditor. [read post]