Search for: "Creeks v. Creeks"
Results 1121 - 1140
of 1,335
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2009, 11:33 am
" They also argue the ESDC failed "to weigh the public benefit that will be realized by the seizure against the benefit that will accrue to the recipient of [the] property," as required under Aspen Creek Estates, Ltd. v Town of Brookhaven (12 NY3d 735). [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 8:59 am
Hilston v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 7:13 am
Craig v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 11:39 am
On September 17, 2009, in Nlaka'pamux Nation Tribal Council v. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 11:39 am
On September 17, 2009, in Nlaka'pamux Nation Tribal Council v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 9:42 am
Williams Download Plum Creek Marketing, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
New Massachusetts companies. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 4:31 pm
If the Land Board accepts the appraisal, it will set in motion the process for leasing Otter Creek coal. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 2:12 pm
In a Texas oil spill case, US v. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 2:58 pm
The whole case, Linhart v. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 8:28 am
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 08-0491, 2009 MT 264, PLUM CREEK MARKETING, INC., PLUM CREEK NORTHWEST PLYWOOD INC., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 3:04 am
He participated on the Board of Directors for Camp Boggy Creek, a camp for seriously ill children. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 5:05 am
Cabrera v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 12:05 am
Creek, 2009 U.S. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 8:21 pm
Only two items were improperly seized -- the 1991 calendar and appointment book and the Moss Creek documents. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 2:37 pm
v=fwvv5IyPkXM&feature=player_embedded http://www.youtube.com/watch? [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 3:47 am
In Kenefick v City of Battle Creek, __ Mich App __ (2009) (approved for publication July 2, 2009), a city ordinance requiring owners of abandoned homes to pay a "monitoring fee" was challenged on grounds that it was both unconstitutionally vague and violated the Equal Protection Clause. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 1:43 am
Summary of Decision issued June 30, 2009Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.Case Name: Hall v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 1:27 am
Summary of Decision issued June 18, 2009Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.Case Name: Velasquez v. [read post]
