Search for: "Defenders of Wildlife" Results 1121 - 1140 of 1,422
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2013, 8:05 am by Marty Lederman
  Therefore, in both cases, the defendants agree with the plaintiffs that the courts ultimately should enjoin the defendants from enforcing the laws in question. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am by Anthony B. Cavender
 Fifth Circuit held that egregious and unsuccessful prosecution of Fair Labor Standards Act warrants award of defendants’ legal fees. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 2:17 pm by John Elwood
United States Fish and Wildlife Service, 17-71, and Markle Interests, LLC. v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 9:02 am by WIMS
     The Eastern District of Louisiana as part of the Deepwater Horizon multidistrict litigation,  in September 2013 granted summary judgment to the defendants saying the Mexican states did not hold a sufficient "proprietary interest" in the allegedly damaged property. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 8:59 am by WIMS
Michigan News <> Wolf Supporters File Suit Challenging Law Intended to Undermine the Will of Michigan Voters - Keep Michigan Wolves Protected filed a lawsuit in Lansing in the Michigan Court of Claims to overturn the so-called Scientific Fish and Wildlife Conservation Act on the grounds that it violates the state's constitution. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 3:12 pm by James R. Marsh
As noted above, the courts have routinely found the victim depicted was harmed by the offender’s possession of the images depicting their abuse.16 Despite the consistency among the courts in finding harm to the victims, the courts have split on whether, and how much restitution to award the victims depicted in the imagery; amounts vary between full restitution,17 de minimus restitution,18 and no restitution.19 The difference in outcome turns on the courts’ causation… [read post]
The Court further described how the aerial photographs admitted into evidence showed where defendants had discharged pollutants in violation of the CWA and WOTUS Rule and rejected all the affirmative defenses offered by defendants. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 11:28 am by Christopher Wright
  If successful, class members would receive three times the amount that they paid for title insurance, up to a cap of $500,000 or one percent of the defendant’s net value. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Defenders of Wildlife, “to convert the undifferentiated public interest in executive officers’ compliance with the law into an ‘individual right’ vindicable in the courts is to permit Congress to transfer from the President to the courts the Chief Executive’s most important constitutional duty, to ‘take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 9:49 am by Priscilla Fasoro and Lauren Wiseman
Defenders of Wildlife (1992) as the invasion of a legally protected interest that is (a) concrete and particularized and (b) actual and imminent; a causal connection between the claimed injury and the alleged act(s) of the defendant, such that the injury is fairly traceable to the defendant’s act(s) and not the independent action of another third party; and that it is likely, and not merely speculative, that the alleged injury will be redressed by a… [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 9:10 pm
Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 560-61 (1992) (citations and quotations marks omitted); see Vermont Agency, 529 U.S. at 771. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:24 am by Monica Williamson
Assert and defend the Yakama Nation’s inherent sovereign and Treaty-reserved rights and interests related to fish and wildlife, natural resources, cultural resources, healthcare, employment, taxation, economic development, and land use planning, to name a few. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 5:21 pm by Susan Schneider
.; Law Clerk, Mostyn Prettyman; Pro Bono Law Clerk, Legal Aid of Arkansas; Research Intern, Nature Conservancy; Consultant, Arkansas Wildlife FederationDistance LL.M. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 5:06 am by Randy Beck, John Langford
Defenders of Wildlife, Justice Antonin Scalia, writing for the Supreme Court, explained that Congress cannot authorize individuals to enforce statutes in the absence of a discrete and personalized injury. [read post]