Search for: "District Court Nevada" Results 1121 - 1140 of 3,298
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2016, 10:21 am by Weisman, Young & Ruemenapp, P.C.
Lewis (Nevada Federal District Court February 10, 2016) the judgment creditors’ request for a permanent injunction was denied despite a fairly compelling factual showing that the debtor, whose net worth previously exceeded $100,000,000, currently claims he is worthless. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 10:21 am by Weisman, Young & Ruemenapp, P.C.
Lewis (Nevada Federal District Court February 10, 2016) the judgment creditors’ request for a permanent injunction was denied despite a fairly compelling factual showing that the debtor, whose net worth previously exceeded $100,000,000, currently claims he is worthless. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 10:21 am by Weisman, Young & Ruemenapp, P.C.
Lewis (Nevada Federal District Court February 10, 2016) the judgment creditors’ request for a permanent injunction was denied despite a fairly compelling factual showing that the debtor, whose net worth previously exceeded $100,000,000, currently claims he is worthless. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 10:21 am by Weisman, Young & Ruemenapp, P.C.
Lewis (Nevada Federal District Court February 10, 2016) the judgment creditors’ request for a permanent injunction was denied despite a fairly compelling factual showing that the debtor, whose net worth previously exceeded $100,000,000, currently claims he is worthless. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 7:49 pm
  As such, the Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court’s grant of partial summary judgment and remanded the case back to the district court to instruct the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office to enter a disclaimer of the term “THE RAT PACK” on TRP’s trademark registration for ““THE RAT PACK IS BACK. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 10:06 am by Anne Egeler
-stage amicus brief on behalf of Washington, fourteen other states, and the District of Columbia in support of the Obama administration in United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 4:20 pm by Anthony B. Cavender
  On January 15, 2016, the Ninth Circuit reversed the district court’s ruling (a federal court sitting in Nevada) that the federal government could not prosecute an action for damages or injunctive relief against ranchers who were grazing their cattle on federal land without a federal grazing permit.Continue reading → [read post]
The United States District Court for the District of New Mexico recently dismissed a lawsuit filed by an employee who was fired after testing positive for marijuana despite using medical marijuana as permitted by New Mexico state law. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 3:49 pm
 He was unanimously confirmed by the Senate to the district court in Nevada when he was appointed by Bush in 2003.Yet here we are.Those readers in Nevada may well be familiar with Judge Jones already. [read post]
16 Jan 2016, 5:13 am by SHG
  The police in Henderson, Nevada disagreed. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 6:33 am by Joy Waltemath
Finding overbroad an employer’s requests for information and medical records concerning an employee’s gender transition, including surgeries, drug or hormone therapy, and other treatment, a federal district court in Nevada denied its motion to compel in part. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 8:20 am by Derek Black
Judge James Wilson of the First Judicial District Court of Nevada (Carson City) has ruled in Lopez v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 7:30 am by Merritt Blakeslee
District Court for Nevada has developed a muscular set of equitable remedies for U.S. patent holders who complain to the court of patent... [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 7:30 am by Merritt Blakeslee
District Court for Nevada has developed a muscular set of equitable remedies for U.S. patent holders who complain to the court of patent infringement by a trade show exhibitor, remedies that the court can and does deploy with sufficient speed to be effective within the narrow timeframe of a trade show. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 4:20 am by Howard Friedman
According to AP,  Carson City District Court Judge James Wilson concluded that plaintiffs had shown a reasonable chance of prevailing on the merits. [read post]