Search for: "Dodd v. State" Results 1121 - 1140 of 1,142
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2016, 5:10 pm by Trent Dykes
  On the public pension fund side, the California Public Employees’ Retirement System, the California State Teachers’ Retirement System (CalSTRS) and the Florida State Board of Administration each support proxy access proposals. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 5:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  First, in a July 8, 2015 decision in Acevedo v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 7:35 am
                  Cheerleading as a Sport under Title IX Approximately half of the U.S. states have already recognized high school cheerleading under Title IX.[11]  Cheerleading has grown significantly in popularity among women, almost 25%, since 2000.[12]  Cheerleading’s largest barrier to achieving… [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 1:50 pm by Kevin LaCroix
 This statistic encompasses all registered investment advisers, not just those who manage private funds, although the Annual Report states that 36% of registered investment advisers manage a private fund. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 6:09 am by James Morphy, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP,
The stated purpose of the CRARA was to "improve ratings quality for the protection of investors and in the public interest by fostering accountability, transparency, and competition in the credit rating agency industry. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 3:55 pm by nedaj
Advisers registered in other states should consult with legal counsel about those states’ custody requirements. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 1:37 pm by Guest Author
In fact, many of the challenges and the conundrums presented by Section 404 rules were not fully appreciated until those issues surfaced again in subsequent statutes, such as the Dodd-Frank Act of 2010 and the JOBS Act of 2012. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 1:56 am by Kevin LaCroix
  And finally, on June 20, 2011 the Court held in the Wal-Mart Stores v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 1:17 am by Kevin LaCroix
In addition, aggrieved investors in failed or troubled privately held banks also filed a variety of other lawsuits, primarily in state courts. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 8:43 am by Kristian Soltes
The bill would ban all mergers and acquisitions for companies with over $100 billion in values, the release stated. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 8:40 pm by Adam Levitin
 The CRA states that a rule may not "take effect," until the rule and its proposed effective date have been transmitted to Congress. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 2:15 pm by Mandelman
” Now, as to why robo-signing only seems to be a serious prosecutable crime in the State of Nevada? [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 1:38 am by Kevin LaCroix
Every fall, I take a step back and survey the most important current trends and developments in the world of Directors’ and Officers’ liability and D&O insurance. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
You are probably well acquainted with its successor, rule 506.[2] Prior to the adoption of former rule 146 in April 1974, the Commission did not have rules interpreting section 4(2) of the Securities Act.[3] As a result, issuers faced uncertainty in determining whether a sale of securities did not involve “any public offering” and in applying case law on the topic, including the Supreme Court’s decision in SEC v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 4:20 pm by Mandelman
 If I wanted to use the corporation, I suppose I would simply contact the state and pay the current fees and bring it back to life. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 6:32 am
On August 25, 2023, two SEC compliance and disclosure interpretations (“C&DI”) were issued related to these quarterly disclosures.[1] C&DI 133A.01 states that Item 408(a)(1) of Regulation S-K does not require disclosure of termination of a plan that ends due to expiration or completion of the plan in accordance with its terms, without any action by an individual. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 6:32 am
On August 25, 2023, two SEC compliance and disclosure interpretations (“C&DI”) were issued related to these quarterly disclosures.[1] C&DI 133A.01 states that Item 408(a)(1) of Regulation S-K does not require disclosure of termination of a plan that ends due to expiration or completion of the plan in accordance with its terms, without any action by an individual. [read post]