Search for: "Doe, et al v. V of T, et al" Results 1121 - 1140 of 3,428
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2011, 1:35 pm by Daniel Corbett
 I’d imagine, for the time being, that distinction belongs to Kevin Garnett et al. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 8:29 pm
In another debt-collection case interpreting the FDCPA itself, Hyde, et al. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 11:01 pm by Orin Kerr
See LaFave, et. al., 2 Criminal Procedure Sec. 4.2(b) (describing cases). [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 8:59 am by Raymond McKenzie
 New York courts have interpreted § 684(3)(c) to mean in essence that  the sale of the first franchise unit is exempt from registration if the unit was only offered to a maximum of two people (See BMW Co., Inc. et al. v Workbench Inc. et al. [read post]
23 Aug 2015, 3:49 pm
He quoted extensively from the Missouri case of Eyerman et al v Mercantile Trust Co. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 12:17 pm by Rachael Hanna
He cited subsequent cases that have construed Kiyemba narrowly: Aamer, et al. v. [read post]
20 May 2009, 5:18 am
: Dr Reddy’s post grant opposition against Pfizer’s Champix patent (Spicy IP) Tanzania generic pharma sector set for growth (Afro-IP) US: ACLU, PUBPAT and others file lawsuit challenging constitutionality of patents on human genes associated with breast and ovarian cancer: Association for Molecular Pathology et al v USPTO et al (Patent Baristas) (Ars Technica) (Patently-O) (IP Watchdog) (The Prior Art) (Patent Docs) (Patents4Life) US:… [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 11:51 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Background As previously discussed, in March 2013, the Western District of Tennessee, in Phipps, et al. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 2:28 pm by Dennis Crouch
  The brief by Google, et al., takes this a step further than the normal “lack of time” and “incompetence” statements –  arguing that the current law and practice “tilt the scales heavily in favor of granting patent applications based on incomplete analyses. [read post]