Search for: "Doe v. Holder"
Results 1121 - 1140
of 6,694
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2012, 5:50 am
The Third Circuit splits with other federal courts in finding that risk of identity theft does not confer standing to bring a suit for data breach in Reilly v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 6:22 pm
If it does not, then Brulotte does not apply. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 2:13 am
The Complainant in General Motors LLC v. [read post]
21 May 2023, 10:47 am
Case citation: Athos Overseas Ltd v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 10:52 pm
(Orin Kerr) The decision is Largent v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 8:07 am
In Sunbeam Products, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 12:35 pm
Horn v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 12:19 pm
The court relied on the Supreme Court’s ruling in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 11:56 pm
Art. 102 TFEU does not limit the right of the SEP holder to request complete information and accounting on infringing acts, including information on the infringer’s costs and profits. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 9:48 am
It is important to keep in mind that Art. 1 Protocol 1 codifies an autonomous concept of “possessions” that does not correspond to a traditional understanding of ownership. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 1:58 pm
”" Ocegueda-Nunez v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 2:25 am
Competing for space and attention with a trademark holder to use one’s own name for one’s own project does not rise to an infringement. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 2:55 am
Holder Suisse S.A. v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 5:25 am
In this week’s opinion, Therasense Inc. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 8:00 am
See Weisman v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 11:07 am
Instead, a new set of seeds must be purchased from patent holder Monsanto. [read post]
4th DCA: If girlfriend shoots and kills boyfriend, does she get to keep the jointly titled accounts?
3 May 2008, 3:10 pm
Julia v. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 4:46 am
Oct. 11, 2022) BONUS: Millennium Funding, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 5:54 am
Bank v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 11:00 am
This case does provide some good news for patent holders as it will be more difficult for patent mismarking plaintiffs to recover the large amounts of potential damages if there is no evidence of an intent to deceive the public. [read post]
