Search for: "Does 1 - 38" Results 1121 - 1140 of 4,956
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2015, 2:28 pm by Thomas D. Nevins
The majority stated that “the Sherman Act does not authorize . [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 6:28 am by Kevin Kaufman
Source: Sales Tax Clearinghouse; Tax Foundation, Facts and Figures 2018: How Does Your State Compare? [read post]
3 May 2013, 3:15 pm by Steven Koprince
” Although the change in policy does not directly affect companies with denial letters before March 1, those companies are entitled to expedited reconsideration: “However, companies that received denial letters with 38 § 74.3(b) (Transfer Restrictions) as a single point of failure before March 1, 2013, can submit for reverification. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 4:26 pm
Three of the four grounds for holding that a registration is invalid, listed in Subsection 18(1) of the Trade-marks Act, are pretty much equivalent (in substance) to the grounds of opposition listed in Subsection 38(2); i.e. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 2:35 pm by Matthew Schoonover
Kingdomware involved the scope of a VA-specific procurement statute, 38 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
The court struck out the recitals and removed all restrictions with respect to race, colour, creed, religion, ethnic origin and sex. [38] BMO argued that the public policy doctrine does not apply in a case such as this in which the granting document (ie: the will) does not say anything that would contravene public policy or create harm to the public. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 6:06 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Twenty-one percent of ART cycles were carried out among women 59 aged 35-37, 19% among women aged 38-40, 9% among women aged 41-42, and 9% among women older than 42. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 12:58 pm by Thorsten Bausch
But just to give a little more background, let me point out the following: Article 38(1) clause 1 BL states that “Members of the German Bundestag shall be elected in general, direct, free, equal and secret elections. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 1:51 am by itars sis
This is because the Criminal Code does not use the terms ‘heritage’ or ‘monument’ in the articles related to cultural heritage[22] (Articles 205, 218, 219 and 222), as prescribed in the Cultural Heritage Protection Act (2008).[23] Therefore, the courts must determine the value in each case on a case-by-case basis and then decide on the penalty. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 1:51 am by itars sis
This is because the Criminal Code does not use the terms ‘heritage’ or ‘monument’ in the articles related to cultural heritage[22] (Articles 205, 218, 219 and 222), as prescribed in the Cultural Heritage Protection Act (2008).[23] Therefore, the courts must determine the value in each case on a case-by-case basis and then decide on the penalty. [read post]
8 May 2009, 4:13 am
It certainly applies within the European Union, but does it prevent English Courts from enjoining parties to litigate outside of Europe? [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 5:21 pm by NL
On (1) and (2) the European Court found that, following Case C? [read post]