Search for: "Does 1 - 75" Results 1121 - 1140 of 4,941
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2009, 2:38 am
What does that have to do with trying a tooth whitener? [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 9:57 am by Larry Tolchinsky
For interest bearing accounts, the interest the tenant has a right to get on the security deposit is (1) at least 75% of the annualized average interest rate payable on such account or (2) interest at the rate of 5% per year, simple interest. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 9:35 am by Andy Taylor
The material-change-of-circumstances standard does not apply in termination of guardianship cases. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 7:25 am by Blogspot
He added that the right to vote was a right guaranteed in, inter alia, Article 3 of Protocol No. 1. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 7:25 am by Unknown
He added that the right to vote was a right guaranteed in, inter alia, Article 3 of Protocol No. 1. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 7:25 am by Kader Kadem
He added that the right to vote was a right guaranteed in, inter alia, Article 3 of Protocol No. 1. [read post]
27 May 2008, 2:45 pm
Co., 2006 NY Slip Op 4486, 1 (3rd Dept. 2006).Contrast those decisions to Kings County New York City Civil Court Judge Genine Edwards' July 2006 decision in Elite Med. [read post]
7 Oct 2012, 4:50 pm by Michael O'Brien
 Thus, Sam receives 75% of the estate and Dot receives 25% of the estate. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 2:23 pm by Sarah Stauffer Curtiss
However, the final rule does not require an agency to select this alternative as the final project action. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 9:37 am by Gail Cecchettini Whaley
SB 63 Imposes Additional Costs on Small Employers That Are Struggling with the Increased Minimum Wage: Even though the leave under SB 63 is not “paid” by the employer, that does not mean the small employer will not suffer added costs. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 1:19 am by Peter Bert
The 1899 Act had come into force, at the same time as the German Civil Code, on January 1, 1900. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 8:11 am by emagraken
 In awarding the Plaintiff 75% of pre-offer costs and having each party bear their own post offer costs the Court provided the following reasons: [21] The dismissal of the action does not necessarily mean the plaintiff is disentitled to any costs: see McElroy v. [read post]