Search for: "Does 1-54"
Results 1121 - 1140
of 3,411
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2012, 2:19 pm
If a car accident does occur, an elderly driver has a greater chance for sustaining age-related personal injury. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 9:00 am
Fifty-four percent (54%) think the members of the GOP are acting like partisan Republicans. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 8:31 am
In 1916 Cuba has 186 operating mills, now it maintains only 54 mills not all of which are fully operational. [read post]
12 May 2022, 3:12 pm
Where the flour is sent on the carpets, so that the dough does not stick, there were mealworms. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 4:45 pm
Although this observation is correct in itself, it does not lead to the conclusion that the disclaimer necessarily fails for this reason to comply with A 123(2). [read post]
26 Dec 2006, 3:11 pm
So what does that mean in round numbers. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm
Although there is only one A 54, there are indeed several concepts of novelty, depending on the technical field that is considered. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 1:18 am
The Advocate General refers to s 54, which is not in the bundle but deals with matters out-with devolved competency. 1400: Court has resumed. [read post]
21 Nov 2009, 10:08 am
Brown, 54 F.3d 234 (5th Cir. 1995)), to learn that a particular guideline does not apply, then its application, while error, is not "plain error. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 6:18 am
In 2013, 29 of the bargaining unit’s 54 employees signed a decertification petition asking the employer to “withdraw recognition from [the Union] immediately” if the petitioners “make up 50% or more of the bargaining unit. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 6:49 am
Woodworth, 54 U.S. 363, 370, 13 How. 363, 14 L.Ed. 181 (1851)). [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 8:07 am
Does not think there is distinction between exempt advisers and registered advisers with respect to disclosure information on the ADV. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 12:27 pm
How does one prove illegal wiretapping when the only evidence (which one had possession of and was demanded back on the grounds of national security) does not exist for all intents and purposes? [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 5:52 am
Ct. at 2553-54): does Daubert v. [read post]
28 Feb 2009, 9:54 am
See, Jones v Bill, 10 NY3d 550 (2008); Tirado v ELRAC Inc., 54 AD3d 261 (3rd Dept. 2008). [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 10:29 pm
Whilst this does have a bearing upon Mrs Justice Pauffley's decision, it is not central, and I shall therefore concentrate on the essential facts, which can be stated briefly:1. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 5:52 am
Ct. at 2553-54): does Daubert v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 4:19 am
See id. at 153–54 (describing the facts of the case). [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 11:52 am
I’m not sure, but I’d be interested to hear other’s thoughts. (1) Iaido, Volume 7 number 2 #54 FEB 1995. [read post]
15 Nov 2008, 12:39 am
Id. at 140-54. [read post]
