Search for: "Does 1-54" Results 1121 - 1140 of 3,411
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2019, 10:53 pm by Joshua Price
Take away 1 – Think your argument through to the end. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 8:31 am by Ed Dickson
At the end of each ride, both the rider and driver rate each other from 5 to 1 (5 being the best). [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 8:06 am by Eugene Volokh
If a statute imposes strict liability for dog bites, does that extend to a herding dog nipping at a cow that then trampled the plaintiff? [read post]
In fact, female Millennials, in particular, accounted for 86% of the growth in the workforce of prime-aged women (those 24–54 years old) in the past 2 years. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 2:03 pm by Kevin LaCroix
This article: 1) discusses why, and how, corporate victims are paying ransom to ransomware attackers; 2) analyzes the legalities involved when a corporation refuses to disclose publicly the details of a ransomware attack; and 3) offers some thoughts on the future concerning ransomware’s current economic boom. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 3:12 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The share of filings in these sectors increased to 62% in 2018 from about 54% in 2017, primarily due to a surge of filings against firms in the technology sector. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 8:18 pm
BACKGROUNDThe facts recited in this opinion are the court's findings based on the testimony and documentary evidence presented at a one-day trial held on October 1, 2018. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 2:19 pm by EBuz
  Yet these donations overwhelmingly favor the coaches of men's teams -- of UI's 54 donated charter flights in the last year, only 1 was to the coach of a woman's team. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 5:25 am by Bob Ambrogi
The E3\G3 includes many eDiscovery features, but does not include the advanced capabilities contained within E5/G5. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 8:24 am by Nico Cordes
Rule 76(1) and (2)(c) EPC does not contain any further requirements regarding the content or quality of the notice of opposition. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 8:27 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
Section 32 should be amended to clarify that section 32(2) does not relieve an employer of the obligation to ensure meal breaks are provided as required by section 32(1), and applies when it is necessary to interrupt a meal break because of an emergency or other exceptional circumstance. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 8:27 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
Section 32 should be amended to clarify that section 32(2) does not relieve an employer of the obligation to ensure meal breaks are provided as required by section 32(1), and applies when it is necessary to interrupt a meal break because of an emergency or other exceptional circumstance. [read post]