Search for: "FISH v. STATE" Results 1121 - 1140 of 3,432
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2019, 1:42 pm by Deborah Heller
Part of the explanation for the repeal notes that the 2015 Rule exceeded the authority granted to the agencies by Congress by adopting an interpretation of the “significant nexus” test provided by Justice Kennedy in his concurrence in Rapanos v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 4:52 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
State of Washington  (Fishing Rights – Usual and Customary Areas)Bay Mills Indian Community v. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 12:10 pm
Nor did Huddleston state, even in its opposition papers, the amount of attorney fees sought. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 5:06 pm by INFORRM
This distinction established, she stated that links are themselves references, which give the person making them no control over the material linked to, and do not in themselves communicate its content. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 1:20 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
20 Jul 2008, 1:48 am
There are several other easy fish in this barrel, like Buck v. [read post]