Search for: "GRAY v. GRAY"
Results 1121 - 1140
of 2,759
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2011, 5:29 pm
Sky Andrew v NGN & Mulcaire Philips v NGN & Mulcaire Gray v NGN & Mulcaire Galloway v NGN & Mulcaire Miller v NGN & Mulcaire? [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 7:41 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
2 May 2022, 10:53 am
Affirming the district court, the appeals court held that the plaintiffs in Berman v. [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 7:53 pm
In the recent case (Kagrimanyan v. [read post]
17 Dec 2016, 9:11 am
[cite to Bland v. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 5:29 am
And Justin Gray of Cox Media discusses DiCristina v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 4:56 am
Gray v. [read post]
28 May 2011, 8:30 am
Peoples v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 3:35 pm
" And news releases on American Electric Power v. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 11:11 am
In Gray v. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 4:37 am
Co. and Apache Corp. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 7:06 am
In today’s case (Iwanik v. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 3:59 pm
Supreme Court decided the seminal case of Alice Corp v. [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 4:30 pm
The Supreme Court heard oral argument yesterday in Massachusetts v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 8:38 am
In last week’s case (Power v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 7:00 pm
., AG v. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 3:11 am
Crystal Visions, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 8:20 pm
Not every gunshot ineluctably results in serious physical injury (see, People v Gray, 30 AD3d 771 [3rd Dept 2006] [victim shot with shotgun from 20 feet away, evidence insufficient to establish serious physical injury]; see also, People v Rojas, 61 NY2d 726 [1984] [gunshot injury does not by itself establish substantial pain as required for physical injury]; People v Francis, 112 AD2d 167 [2nd Dept 1985] [same]; People v Horton, 9 AD3d 503 [3rd Dept… [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 6:03 pm
Highlights this week included: Biotechnology patents: Court of Justice of the EU decides against patent theory of Monsanto: Monsanto v Cefetra & Ors (BLOG@IP::JUR) (EPLAW) (IPKat) Prilosec / Losec (Omeprazole) – EU: General Court largely upholds European Commission decision in AstraZeneca v Commission (EPLAW) (IPKat) General An overview of the ‘Health Impact Fund’ model for accessible medicines (Spicy IP) Pharma pay-and-procure symposium (IP… [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 5:14 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: http://thinkipstrategy.com/subscribe/ Highlights this week included: Biotechnology patents: Court of Justice of the EU decides against patent theory of Monsanto: Monsanto v Cefetra & Ors (BLOG@IP::JUR) (EPLAW) (IPKat) Prilosec / Losec (Omeprazole) - EU: General Court largely upholds European Commission decision in AstraZeneca v Commission (EPLAW) (IPKat) General An… [read post]
