Search for: "Goldstein "
Results 1121 - 1140
of 5,875
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2016, 10:14 pm
By Brian Taylor Goldstein, Esq. [read post]
7 Nov 2006, 10:39 am
.” Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman has a “stem cell outlook and planning effort,” and Sterne Kessler Goldstein Fox has formed a [...] [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 10:02 am
“New term, new look”: Tom Goldstein has this post at “SCOTUSblog” explaining that, “with a smaller team running the blog’s day-to-day operations, we will no longer have full coverage of every merits case. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 10:41 pm
By Brian Taylor Goldstein, Esq. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 10:46 pm
By Brian Taylor Goldstein, Esq. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 10:51 am
SCOTUSblog is pleased to announce the arrival of future blogger Elizabeth (Betsy) Rose Howe-Goldstein, born to Tom and Amy this morning. [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 8:52 pm
WaPo: “In Cleveland — the largest market in a state crucial to both sides — the campaigns and their allies have spent $13.6 million on broadcast television, according to data from Goldstein’s firm. [read post]
26 Dec 2006, 3:32 am
"Courts Side With NSA On Wiretaps": Today in The New York Sun, Joseph Goldstein has an article that begins, "Defense lawyers who had hoped that the public disclosure a year ago of the National Security Agency's wiretapping program would yield information favorable to their clients are being rebuffed by the federal judiciary, which in a series of unusually consistent rulings has rejected efforts by terrorism suspects to access the records. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 12:00 am
Goldstein On April 22, 2014, the United States Supreme Court, in a 6-2 decision (with Justice Kagan recused), upheld a Michigan ballot initiative that amended the state constitution to prohibit the use of race conscious admissions policies at state universities. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 7:31 am
The title of this post is a quote from Tom Goldstein's live-blogging at SCOTUSblog in reaction to the handing down of the final opinions of the 2009 Supreme Court Term. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 4:22 am
” Sara Goldstein presents Bargain [...] [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 3:00 am
Tune in tomorrow for the webcast – “M&A Stories: Practical Guidance (Enjoyably Digested)” – to hear Withersworldwide’s Ridge Barker, Ropes & Gray’s Jane Goldstein, Morgan Lewis’ Keith Gottfried and our own John Jenkins share M&A “war stories” designed to both educate and entertain. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 3:42 am
"Paper Refuses Judge's Request That Its Reporter Appear": Today in The New York Sun, Joseph Goldstein has an article that begins, "The New York Times is declining a federal judge's request that one of its reporters appear in court today to explain how he got front-page scoops about the internal communications of a pharmaceutical company. [read post]
5 May 2003, 11:20 am
DC Supreme Court litigators Goldstein & Howe report the US Supreme Court Monday morning handed down its decision in Madigan v. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 2:06 am
That's the question raised by Jay Weaver in today's Herald.Less than 1% of cert petitions get granted, but Tom Goldstein signed on to this one and there are very interesting legal issues getting lots of pub. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 12:54 am
By Brian Taylor Goldstein, Esq. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 7:24 pm
Doubleday’s flack emails me about a new book called Errors and Omissions by Paul Goldstein, a law professor at Stanford who wrote an earlier book, Copyright’s Highway, that was an early (1994) entry in the “new media law” category. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 1:06 pm
., the Supreme Court Institute, The American Civil Liberties Union – Georgetown Law, and the Georgetown Law Federalist Society will co-host a mid-term preview, featuring panelists Kannon Shanmugam, Melissa Arbus Sherry, Jeff Wall, and Tom Goldstein, and moderated by Amy Howe. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 5:45 am
"Judge To Review Lawyer Ads": Today in The New York Sun, Joseph Goldstein has an article that begins, "New state rules prohibiting certain attorney advertisements will face their first legal test Friday, when a federal judge in Syracuse hears oral arguments on whether the restrictions violate the First Amendment. [read post]
11 Mar 2003, 6:15 am
Ashcroft is finally over, the Supreme Court Monday having refused a petition to rehear [PDF text] (the subject, by the way, of a somewhat critical assessment by DC appellate lawyers Goldstein & Howe on their SCOTUSblog). [read post]
