Search for: "Grant v. Superior Court"
Results 1121 - 1140
of 6,580
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2020, 12:57 pm
The court also rejected the Court of Appeal’s reliance on Tull v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 10:25 am
The Court of Appeals in State v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 12:05 pm
Superior Court (2011) 51 C4th 538, 545-546. [read post]
5 May 2020, 12:05 pm
Superior Court (2011) 51 C4th 538, 545-546. [read post]
5 May 2020, 7:05 am
MDS Inc. v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 10:39 am
VBS Distribution, Inc. v. [read post]
3 May 2020, 7:19 am
Superior Ct. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
The Court said that §80 of the Civil Service Law "reflects a legislative imperative" that the City was powerless to bargain away.As the Court of Appeals said in County of Chautauqua v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
The Court said that §80 of the Civil Service Law "reflects a legislative imperative" that the City was powerless to bargain away.As the Court of Appeals said in County of Chautauqua v. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 3:00 am
On appeal, this decision was affirmed by the Superior Court. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 8:36 pm
Superior Court, 27 Cal. 4th 256, 278, n. 10 (2002). [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 1:00 am
The question of whether to grant a motion to stay in these circumstances was in need of appellate guidance with respect to a uniform way for state trial courts to address such motions.An Appellate Case of First ImpressionThat appellate guidance arrived in March of this year, when the Pennsylvania Superior Court, in a case of first impression at the state court appellate level, adopted the same six-factor test in the case of Keesee v. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 10:07 am
Superior Ct. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 12:26 am
South African courts have begun to hand down judgments electronically via email and publication on court websites, for example the case of Liberty Group Limited v Illman. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 6:47 pm
Co. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 8:16 am
Supreme Court’s ruling in Janus v. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 3:00 am
Greenhill v. [read post]
25 Apr 2020, 10:17 am
Superior Ct. [read post]
25 Apr 2020, 7:37 am
No mea culpa, no money damages As to the normally requested remedy in such cases–money damages–the vice chancellor noted PHC has not requested that here, although it has a related suit pending in the Delaware Superior Court for defamation—which must be heard by a jury and where damages are an available remedy. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 2:30 pm
Superior Court (1988) 46 Cal.3d 355, 360-361. [read post]
