Search for: "HUGHES v. STATE" Results 1121 - 1140 of 1,785
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Oct 2018, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 1:59 am by Matrix Law
R (on the application of VIP Communications Ltd (In Liquidation)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 4th October 2022 McCue v Glasgow City Council, heard 18th October 2022 Unger and another (in substitution for Hasan) v Ul-Hasan (deceased) and another, heard 20th October 2022 In the matter of an application by Rosaleen Dalton for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 26th October 2022. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
TLU v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2018] EWCA Civ 2217. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Claimants included the Duchess of York, James Blunt, Christopher Eccleston,Uri Geller and Hugh Grant, as reported by Press Gazette. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Hugh Grant’s evidence perhaps provoked the biggest press reaction by suggesting that his phone had been hacked by the Mail on Sunday. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 1:21 pm by John Elwood
United States and Beckles v. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
BPE Solicitors & Anor v Hughes-Holland (in substitution for Gabriel), heard 14-15 December 2016. [read post]
9 May 2007, 11:30 am
Moreover, when an applicant for a Technical Assistance Agreement (TAA) seeks approval to export preparatory data, the State Department may ask him to obtain the approval of the owner, thus forcing him to disclose his strategy. [read post]
26 May 2023, 4:36 am by Dan Filler
To request this document in an alternate format or to request a reasonable accommodation, please contact the Department of Accessibility Services at 404-727-9877 (V) | 404-712-2049 (TDD). [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 3:48 pm by NL
The District Judge’s order stated that the court found that Ms Boyle was and had been a secure tenant of the Highbury flat within the meaning of section 79 of the 1985 Act. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 3:48 pm by NL
The District Judge’s order stated that the court found that Ms Boyle was and had been a secure tenant of the Highbury flat within the meaning of section 79 of the 1985 Act. [read post]