Search for: "House v. Close"
Results 1121 - 1140
of 7,514
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2022, 7:01 am
Three months after cert-stage briefing closed, the Court issued a per curiam opinion without oral argument and without any merits briefing. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 6:29 am
’ ” Id. at 111-12 (quoting Doggett v. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Palin v. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 12:08 am
However, they will monitor the situation closely. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 3:49 am
I remember when candidate Trump, from the debate stage, announced he would appoint a Supreme Court justice who would overrule Roe v. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 6:14 pm
V(1). [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 11:11 am
She was poised even when she was being peppered with questions from all sides of the bench, as she was in defending an ultimately unsuccessful position in her first argument, in Begay v. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 9:46 am
Van Orden v. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 2:46 pm
In Ross v. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 1:00 am
One of the tricks with this is it's really hard to verify those hypotheses because they're all happening on closed platforms that can actually restrict our access to them. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 6:04 pm
I am delighted to announce that the essays in Volume 16(1) of Emancipating the Mind: Bulletin of the Coalition for Peace & Ethics (Summer 2021) (ISSN 2689-0283 (Print); 2689-0291 (Online); ISBN 978-1-949943-06-1) are now available.This issue includes essays on Contemporary China--Heartland, Periphery, and Silk Roads. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 1:49 pm
The House passed the BBB Act with $150 billion in funding for HCBS, now it’s time for the Senate to follow their lead. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
This approach was not adopted on the basis that Article V tribunals are required only in cases of “doubt” whether a person qualifies as a prisoner of war; because detainees could not qualify as prisoners of war, there was no reason to have Article V tribunals. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 1:00 am
Inforrm published an article on the closing submissions here. [read post]
22 Jan 2022, 8:46 am
State v. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
As the Supreme Court noted in DHS v. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 8:30 pm
Even so, the Nixon v. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
Hurn v. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 11:36 am
The other five employees were high ranking, in-house employees that worked closely with (and were subordinate to) the defendant. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
Craig comes to Danielle's house to attack the niece and Danielle, and the gardener gets caught in the crossfire. [read post]
