Search for: "In Re Amendments to Rules of Civil Procedure" Results 1121 - 1140 of 2,353
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm by John Ehrett
In re Sharp 15-646Issue: (1) Whether Johnson v. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 1:47 pm by Shahid Buttar
Let us know if you’re willing to take action where you live when it does. [read post]
Although the various complaints seek multiple forms of relief, they generally ask the courts to declare that the rule is unlawful because it: 1) exceeds the agencies’ statutory authority under the Clean Water Act; 2) violates the 11th Amendment of the Constitution and the Clean Water Act, which preserves the primary role of States in planning the development and use of local land and water resources; and   3) violates the Administrative Procedures Act. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 7:21 am by Mark S. Humphreys
Essex filed to dismiss the claims against it under Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 91a, arguing that the "no direct action" rule, Zuniga's lack of standing, and lack of ripeness bar Zuniga from suing Essex until SDT's liability has been determined. [read post]
25 Dec 2015, 12:08 pm by Shahid Buttar
An appellate panel ruled that it will not rule on the Fourth Amendment issues arising from tapping into Internet cables even though the government admitted doing so, but will instead wait for the lower court to complete its examination of the entire case before considering an appellate review. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 3:34 pm by familoo
But oddly, there is still no express exhortation in the Family Procedure rules to have regard to LiP status when making case management decisions. [read post]
19 Dec 2015, 7:58 am by Gritsforbreakfast
If they're out of jail awaiting trial, they're more likely to care about a fair one.Interestingly, "two SCAC members who are practicing jurists opposed the idea. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 1:07 pm by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
Procedures establishing qualifications and standards for caregivers, including conducting appropriate background checks, and procedures for the issuance and annual renewal of caregiver identification cards. c. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 10:33 am by John Elwood
AT&T moved to dismiss, arguing that the relator failed to comply with Rule 9(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by not stating specific facts regarding at least one allegedly false or fraudulent claim submitted to the government. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 10:45 am by John Elwood
Swamp the Court with cert. petitions,             Re re re re re re re re list! [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am by Anthony B. Cavender
  The DC Court noted that the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) provides an interested person with the right to petition for issuance, amendment or repeal of a rule and, if the SEC were to deny the petition, the unsuccessful petitioner could seek review of that decision in the court of appeals after a First Amendment argument has been squarely made to the SEC; “they are not required to violate the regulation and risk prosecution to test their… [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 6:57 am by Eugene Volokh
Despite the clear mandates of Michigan statutory and common law, the Judge (Cheryl Matthews, Oakland County Circuit Court, up for re-election this next month) grants her ex’s motion. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm by John Elwood
Both cases involve the theory of implied false certification under the False Claims Act, and Triple Canopy also asks whether Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 9(b)’s requirement of pleading fraud with particularity obliges a plaintiff to plead actual reliance by the government on the alleged false statement. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 6:21 am by Eugene Volokh
” Glick assisted Defendant Townsend in her re-write and re-brand of a novel, including creation of the title “The Forlorned. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 11:31 am by Lisa Baird
​In changes that have been five years in the making, amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure go into effect today, December 1, 2015. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 9:39 am by Ronald Collins
In subsequent decades, as jurists and scholars criticized Warren’s major decisions, public schools re-segregated along racial and class lines, and problems in the field of criminal justice have intensified. [read post]