Search for: "In re INITIATIVE PETITION NO. 2"
Results 1121 - 1140
of 1,946
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2014, 3:00 am
When Debtors initially filed their chapter 7 petition, the U.S. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 6:56 am
One of the agency’s problems, I suggested, was that it was completely boxed in by prior commitments and decisions and precedents, some dating back to the early 1980s, and that its ability to take a fresh look at the cable/wireless broadband Internet access market was completely and thoroughly constrained by the need to be consistent with all of its earlier efforts, dozens of which were cited/quoted in the opinion - In re Amendment of Section 64.702 of the Commission’s… [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 2:48 am
The Barclay brothers lodged a petition against this 2010 Law. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 7:58 am
Your client is an inmate serving a 3-9 sentence for Grand Larceny Third starting on November 2, 2011. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 11:00 am
This petition asks more questions about Section 51.003, including: (1) whether it creates a right to an offset when a lender resells the property on the open market rather than a foreclosure sale and (2) how to compute fair market value to compute the offset. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 7:22 am
They’re dipping into the pockets of servers and busboys and other staff. [read post]
7 Sep 2014, 5:42 pm
This means that most inmates serving life sentences for non-serious/non-violent offenses (i.e. - huge numbers of people in LA from the Garcetti era) could petition the Court for re-sentencing as "2nd strikers," meaning they got much shorter sentences and their life sentences were vacated. [read post]
7 Sep 2014, 5:42 pm
This means that most inmates serving life sentences for non-serious/non-violent offenses (i.e. - huge numbers of people in LA from the Garcetti era) could petition the Court for re-sentencing as "2nd strikers," meaning they got much shorter sentences and their life sentences were vacated. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 3:29 pm
Initial attempts to settle the matter were unsuccessful, and this litigation followed. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 6:00 am
Answer #6 A Re-entry permit! [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 8:14 am
See 42 U.S.C. s11603(e)(2)(B); Lozano v. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 3:31 am
If successfully prosecuted, this contractual dissolution claim will extinguish the statutory claim under LLCL § 702 that initially co-existed with the contractual claim albeit, in the alternative, in view of the priorities dictated by LLCL § 701. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 3:58 pm
With them, the protesting judges carried a petition signed by 2,200 Moroccan judges — roughly 2/3rds of the country’s total judges — demanding structural reforms to guarantee their independence from the King. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 5:07 pm
In re ePlus, Inc., 540 Fed App’x 998 (Fed. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 10:01 pm
In a 2-1 decision, the U.S. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 12:23 pm
Section 108(a) gives the Trustee 2 years from the petition date to commence an action. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 7:19 am
They include Magna Carta, the Petition of Right 1628, the Bill of Rights and (in Scotland) the Claim of Right Act 1689, the Act of Settlement 1701 and the Act of Union 1707. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 5:06 am
Defense Attorney: Robert Epstein 2. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
(2) Is the adoption of an ordinance enacting a voter-sponsored initiative under Elections Code section 9214, subdivision (a), a “ministerial project” exempt from CEQA pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21080, subdivision (b)(1)? [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 8:58 am
See, e.g., In re Cutter, 398 B.R. 6, 21 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 2008) (quoting Nelson v. [read post]
