Search for: "In re Interest of Thomas M."
Results 1121 - 1140
of 1,214
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2019, 12:00 am
On the other hand, “where the interest of the beneficiary is remote in the sense that vesting is most unlikely, or the opportunity for the power or discretion to be exercised is equally unlikely”, it would be rare to find that the beneficiary could be said to suffer unreasonable disadvantage if uninformed of the trust’s existence. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 5:36 pm
France The re-election campaign website of French President Emmanuel Macron was found to be the least compliant with EU data protection standards, but none of the major candidates for the presidency were discovered to be fully compliant with data regulations. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 12:00 am
On the other hand, “where the interest of the beneficiary is remote in the sense that vesting is most unlikely, or the opportunity for the power or discretion to be exercised is equally unlikely”, it would be rare to find that the beneficiary could be said to suffer unreasonable disadvantage if uninformed of the trust’s existence. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 7:32 am
But in the end, all the “reform” discussion boils down to re-arranging deck chairs on the Titanic, which isn’t the appointment process, but the ship of state. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 12:06 pm
(Sasha Volokh) On Friday, I posted the introduction to my latest paper, Prisons, Privatization, and the Elusive Employee-Contractor Distinction. [read post]
27 Feb 2025, 3:15 am
As I said yesterday, this case should be of interest even if you're not interested in adult entertainment (indeed, even if you're hostile to adult entertainment). [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
Christina Bobb and M. [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm
The piece notes that neither judgment fully explains the reasoning behind their decisions, despite there being significant public interest in the outcome. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 3:30 am
Everyone with an interest in the Patent System needs to take it upon themselves to get the word out, talk to friends and family and push the agenda forward. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 5:09 am
As a side note, it is interesting to consider that the pending Employment Non-Discrimination Act might not permit attorney fees to the prevailing party, depending on changes that are currently still in Committee and have not yet been made public. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 8:29 am
Given that, we’re pleased to have the chance to ask you, and now David, the questions for a change. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 4:40 am
Lammers, Putnam County Prosecuting Attorney, for Appellant State of Ohio Carly M. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:08 am
Higher interest costs would increase future losses. [read post]
28 May 2020, 8:23 am
Will the Pandemic Finally Get Central Banks Interested in Building Digital Currencies? [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 2:04 pm
Mitchell Dee Thomas, for Defendant-Appellant. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 7:31 am
Given their experience over the long haul, I'm not sure why Rick assumes that they're "short-sighted. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 11:39 pm
Or if you’re teaching an advanced criminal law class, you might want to have your students buy chapter 8, which covers the modern criminal law of gun control, particularly under the federal Gun Control Act.Summary of Contents ContentsPrefaceAcknowledgementsEditorial Note PART ONETHE ORIGINS OF THE RIGHT TO ARMS Chapter 1. [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 1:47 pm
” I’m not saying Scott can’t quit, but Scott has said that himself: “It would be wonderful if we could all have a big group hug, but ethics precludes me from pretending this never happened . . . [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 3:00 am
Federal Inquiry of Trump Friend Focused on Foreign Lobbying MSN – Sharon LaFraniere, Maggie Haberman, William Rashbaum, Ben Protess, and David Kirkpatrick (New York Times) | Published: 7/28/2019 Federal prosecutors are investigating the role of Thomas Barrack, a top campaign fundraiser and close friend of President Trump, and his connections to the foreign lobby. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 3:00 am
Judge Thomas Griffith asked tough questions of the Justice Department lawyer who argued on the administration’s behalf and the lawyer for the U.S. [read post]
