Search for: "In re Marks"
Results 1121 - 1140
of 30,056
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2013, 4:12 am
In re T& C Imports, Serial No. 85570200 (July 25, 2013) [not precedential].The goods are legally identical because applicant's "knitting yarns" encompass the goods of the cited registration. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 11:43 am
Letter to Secretary of Defense Mark Esper 2019 10 07 Eec Engel Schiff to Esper Dod Re Subpoena (PDF)2019 10 07 Eec Engel Schiff to Esper Dod Re Subpoena (Text) Schedule for Esper Letter to Acting Director of the Office of Management and Budget Russell Vought Dod Subpoena Schedule 10 07 19 Hpsci (PDF)Dod Subpoena Schedule 10 07 19 Hpsci (Text) Schedule for Vought 2019 10 07 Eec Engel Schiff to Vought Omb Re Subpoena (PDF)2019 10 07… [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 3:06 am
Cir. 2017) (quoting In re Shell Oil Co., 992 F.2d 1204, 26 USPQ2d 1687, 1690 (Fed. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 3:31 am
Mark Twain on “originality”: Old Man: Whatsoever a man is, is due to his make, and to the influences brought to bear upon it by his heredities, his habitat, his associations. [read post]
5 May 2008, 4:38 am
Thanks,Mark MethenitisDisclaimer The content of this blog is not legal advice. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 2:14 pm
See In re SPX Corp., 63 USPQ2d 1592 (TTAB 2002). [read post]
18 Nov 2020, 3:18 am
At Slate, two unduly passionate legal pundits, Dahlia Lithwick and Mark Joseph Stern, want you to know this is a “con. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 1:58 am
In 2016, Hale Devices Inc. acquired the Aiwa trade marks for the US, changed its name to Aiwa Corporation and marketed a speaker under the Aiwa brand.In 2017 a Japanese company called Towada Audio acquired Sony's AIWA trade mark portfolio and changed its name to Aiwa Co Ltd in order to re-establish the brand. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 11:00 pm
In re Cabot Safety Intermediate Corporation, Serial No. 78903884 (January 12, 2009) [not precedential].Because the marks are identical, the Board found that the first du Pont factor weighed "heavily in favor of a finding of likelihood of confusion. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 11:00 am
" [TTABlog query: How about chocolate if you're hunting moose?] [read post]
24 May 2013, 2:27 am
See In re Nett Designs Inc., 236 F.3d 1339, 57 USPQ2d 1564 (Fed. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 10:00 pm
In re Etablissements Darty et Fils, 759 F2d. 15, 17 (Fed. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 3:11 am
In re Rozier, Serial No. 86005944 (March 5, 2015) [not precedential]. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 2:48 am
In re Nett Designs, Inc., 236 F.3d 1339, 57 USPQ2d 1564, 1566 (Fed. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 4:04 am
In re Spy Optic Inc., Serial No. 85588592 (November 29, 2013) [not precedential]. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 8:21 pm
In re Engineering Systems Corp., 2 USPQ2d 1075 (TTAB 1986). [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 8:28 am
What is needed in judges is greater fidelity to the Constitution as originally meant and understood, and the pressures to get re-elected drive Congress away from constitutional fidelity. [read post]
18 May 2017, 3:28 am
Instead it contended that the registrant had consented to registration of the applied-for mark, and that under In re Strategic Partners, Inc., 102 USPQ2d 1397 (TTAB 2012), the 13th du Pont factor should be considered in light of applicant's ownership of the slightly different color logo mark shown farther below, for the same services. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 2:20 am
"Here, and unlike in In re Les Halles, the services are to be provided in the place named. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 3:57 am
In re Duracell U.S. [read post]
