Search for: "John Doe Defendants" Results 1121 - 1140 of 11,541
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2017, 1:33 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  Putting aside the federalism question for the moment, John's criticism is that the bill does not contain an express mental state (mens rea) requirement for the "kill" prong.Because the bill does not require that a defendant intend to kill or even know his "victim" was a "federally funded public safety officer," its severe penalties would apply if someone accidentally crashed into an officer with a bicycle, motorcycle, or… [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 2:10 am by Jessica Jones, Matrix
The Court clarified that that does not make s 17 a strict liability offence. [read post]
8 May 2012, 3:20 pm by Timothy B. Lee
Cable suggested the text of a notice that would be sent to each of the 39 "John Doe" defendants. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 9:09 pm
John WardHolding: Defendant's Motion for Judgment As A Matter of Law Par. 5 GRANTEDTwo days after Boston Scientific lost all of its post-trial motions before Judge Ward in the Saffran case, which result in to $501 judgment earlier this year, it fared better with the same judge on claims arising out of its $250 million loss earlier in the year.The first claim was that JMOL was appropriate as to the accused products not tested by the plaintiff's expert. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 3:25 pm
Filed by educational reform advocates in Los Angeles Superior Court on behalf of the parents of six LAUSD students, the suit also originally named the teachers’ union and LAUSD superintendent John Deasy as defendants. [read post]
8 Sep 2024, 7:20 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
The Economist [unpaywalled]: “Let Truth and falsehood grapple,” argued John Milton in Areopagitica, a pamphlet published in 1644 defending the freedom of the press. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 2:25 pm
  The court begins the opinion by explaining thatAppellant John Doe appeals from his convictions of aggravated identity theft under 18 U.S. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 3:13 pm by Bob Bauer, Quinta Jurecic
” The Cohen sentencing memo does not explicitly allege the commission of a crime on Trump’s part, nor does it make an effort to establish the requisite state of mind: prosecutors would need to show that Trump had “knowingly and willfully” violated the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) in order to bring charges, though the Justice Department recently relaxed the standard for how detailed a knowledge of the relevant law the defendant must have. [read post]