Search for: "Justice Party (The)"
Results 1121 - 1140
of 60,429
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2012, 9:28 am
Given that neither party to the case — the U.S. government and, on the other hand, a collection of plaintiffs challenging the law — wanted to back the position that the AIA should block the case from being heard by the justices now, the court had to appoint someone to make those arguments. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 10:42 am
The parties largely agree that the treaty guarantees the right to travel for trade. [read post]
Should the Judicial Ethics Code Apply to Supreme Court Justices Like It Does To Other Federal Judges
25 Feb 2011, 6:00 am
One concern is the recent attendance of Supreme Court justices at events sponsored by conservative groups: The group's appeal on Wednesday, in a letter to the House and Senate Judiciary committees, comes after recent controversies involving travel and appearances at political events by several Supreme Court justices, including Clarence Thomas and Antonin Scalia. . . . [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 1:56 pm
Courts will look at whether the parties justifiably relied upon the older Morin framework, which accepted institutional delays as valid and did not require the defence to be proactive. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 1:22 pm
It’s dignity-bestowing, and these parties say they want to have that, that same ennoblement. [read post]
3 Oct 2024, 6:06 am
Without fulfilling this right, justice remains incomplete. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 2:38 pm
This is not to say that California affords full protection to third parties. [read post]
24 Dec 2019, 4:30 pm
Setting Aside a Verdict in the Interest of Justice Pursuant to the New York laws of civil practice, the court may set aside a verdict in the interest of justice upon the motion of a party or by its own initiative. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm
Justice Harlan’s concurrence, which later became the law, explained that people have a reasonable expectation of privacy in their telephone conversations. [read post]
14 Nov 2020, 9:23 am
Evidence from both parties highlighted that the human brain is not mature by the age of 10. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 6:06 am
” to take action to prevent and suppress genocide, ought to preclude action by the ICJ; and there was no “dispute” between the Parties. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 12:06 pm
” When Isaacson continued to stand by the third-party/taxpayer discussion, Justice Kagan turned the discussion back to the text of the statute, and specifically the meaning of the word “collection. [read post]
2 Jun 2024, 9:04 am
Cabrera was the candidate for councilor of the PVEM- Mexico’s Green Party. [read post]
Argument preview: Justices turn to constitutional limits on appointment of administrative law judges
16 Apr 2018, 7:02 am
Similarly, the ALJs cannot themselves sanction parties for contempt or issue subpoenas compelling parties to appear or produce information; all such actions must come from the commissioners themselves. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 12:37 pm
The lack of a compelling legal question was apparent to them from the outset: When they announced that they would hear the case on the merits, the justices asked the parties to brief only one, straightforward question: whether the men’s convictions must be set aside under Brady v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 2:32 pm
The Working Party finds the proposed Directive on police and criminal justice matters “disappointing in its lack of ambition compared to the Regulation”. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 8:45 am
Justice William O. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 5:13 am
On Corrections the chairmanship flipped parties, though that may make less of a difference policy-wise than the new chairs on the other two panels.Corrections looks like it will be a particularly reform-minded committee, as it's been in each of the last couple of sessions. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 3:23 pm
Stinnie, the justices agreed to decide whether a plaintiff who obtains a preliminary injunction is a “prevailing party” for purposes of receiving an award of attorney’s fees, when there is no final ruling on the merits of the plaintiff’s claim – here, because the Virginia legislature repealed the law that the plaintiffs were challenging. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:52 am
In compelling production Madam Justice Bruce provided the following reasons: [35] Based on these authorities, I am satisfied that Mr. [read post]
