Search for: "Kerr v. State"
Results 1121 - 1140
of 1,523
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2010, 7:38 am
Mike Dorf recaps an ABA webinar on last Term’s animal cruelty “crush video” case, United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 6:51 am
And finally, coverage of the GPS surveillance case, United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 4:05 pm
The contrast with the cool and measured approach (unlike, it is accepted, this post) of Lords Kerr and Wilson in their minority judgment is notable. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 7:38 am
In People v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 1:00 am
The proposed panel for hand down is Lord Reed, Lord Kerr, Lady Arden, Lord Kitchin, and Lord Sales. [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 11:03 am
All salvaged with a Herring aid.United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 1:47 pm
The case is United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 9:37 am
” The Court also heard oral arguments yesterday in United States v. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 1:45 am
The panel will be Lady Hale, Lord Kerr, Lord Sumption, Lord Hughes and Lord Toulson. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 12:50 am
MP (Sri Lanka) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, The panel will be Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lords Kerr, Hughes, and Toulson. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 10:57 am
In Stewart v. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 9:48 am
In Jones v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 7:39 am
United States. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 7:41 am
On this blog, Orin Kerr previewed the search-related issue presented in United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 6:46 am
Yesterday, the Connecticut Supreme Court held in a 4-3 decision in State v. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 12:19 pm
Just yesterday, in Virginia v. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 2:37 pm
And yet, following the DC Circuit's decision in United States v Maynard (which eventually became United States v Jones when it was decided by the Supreme Court), individual jurists and scholars have increasingly embraced a mosaic theory of the Fourth Amendment, under which a discrete action (watching someone in public, seeking their phone records via a grand jury subpoena) becomes unconstitutional when government officials engage in that action too… [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:47 am
The guiding principle in Scots law is Lawrie v Muir 1950 JC 19, which states that an irregularity in the method by which evidence has been obtained does not necessarily make that evidence inadmissible in a criminal prosecution [17]. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 10:42 pm
United States and Riley v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 10:15 am
Supreme Court's ruling Tuesday in the Martinez v. [read post]
