Search for: "Kerr v. State" Results 1121 - 1140 of 1,614
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2011, 8:42 am by Dave
Three decisions of the Administrative Appeals Chamber of the Upper Tribunal on HB matters stand out: SS v North East Lincolnshire Council (HB) [2011] UKUT 300 (AAC); MB v Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea (HB) [2011] UKUT 321 (AAC); MR v Bournemouth Borough Council (HB) [2011] UKUT 284 (AAC). [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 4:08 am
"And at "The Volokh Conspiracy," Orin Kerr has a post titled "Oral Argument in United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 6:44 am by Adam Chandler
At the Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr also responds. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:31 pm by Bexis
Kerr-McGee Corp., 464 U.S. 238 (1984)).Claims asserting fraud on the FDA inherently “conflict with, and are therefore impliedly pre-empted by” the “ample” powers the FDA has to combat fraud itself. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 12:45 am by CMS
Lord Thomas and Lord Kerr both agreed with Lord Briggs’ judgment, but Lord Kerr passed away a few days prior to the scheduled date for handing down the judgment. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 7:34 pm
Earlier this month the Supreme Court of Virginia, in Jaynes v Virginia [PDF], struck down that state’s anti-spam legislation as unconstitutional, because it was ‘over-broad’. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 4:50 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Here is a post dated today:Brain Dysfunction and Capital Mitigation Loyd v. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 10:54 pm by Orin Kerr
If I’m right that this difference explains our disagreement, then we’re essentially playing out the majority and dissenting opinions in United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 4:43 pm by Big Tent Democrat
As Orin Kerr succinctly states: The point of the Necessary and Proper clause is that it grants Congress the power to use means outside the enumerated list of of Article I powers to achieve the ends listed in Article I. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 2:44 pm
Anything that calls more attention to wanton GPS surveillance of citizens is well worth talking about because, mark my words, the Supreme Court is going to get this issue soon if United States v. [read post]
12 May 2015, 4:45 am by SHG
When Jim Tyre sent me the decision in United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 6:26 am by Kiran Bhat
Tuesday’s arguments in the GPS surveillance case United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 8:23 am by ASAD KHAN
The Supreme Court Lady Hale and Lords Kerr, Wilson, Reed and Hughes unanimously held that they had jurisdiction to hear the appeal because the outcome in Sala was plainly incorrect. [read post]