Search for: "Matter of State of New York v Robert A." Results 1121 - 1140 of 1,866
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2014, 9:08 am by Joel Graczyk
Like the legal profession generally, the United States Supreme Court has a reputation as slow to embrace new technologies. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
A complete discussion in North Carolina would also need to include State v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 3:30 am by Peter Katz
Information regarding New York State weapon crimes is located on the New York State criminal defense section of the website. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 7:35 am
.' In the 1992 movie "Night and the City," Robert DeNiro's character (a New York attorney who desired to become a boxing promoter) expressed a sentiment I commonly hear about how a "good" divorce attorney should act in achieving his or her client's aims (and I am paraphrasing here): 'my job is to get 'em over a barrel, and then get the settlement.' But, there are all kinds of dangers and pitfalls by allowing that theme to… [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 7:17 pm by Nikki Siesel
In New York, the Second Circuit uses the factors that were set forth in Polaroid Corp. v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 10:50 am by Guest Blogger
The New York Timesheadline writers selected “American Architect” to announce Gordon Wood’s review of Cheney’s book. [read post]
8 May 2014, 12:44 pm by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Schaufele IIICase number: 10-cv-05760 (United States District Court for the Southern District of New York)Case filed: July 29, 2010Qualifying Judgment/Order: March 21, 2014 04/22/2014 07/21/2014 2014-38 SEC v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 9:40 am by Howard Friedman
Supreme Court today handed down a 5-4 decision in Town of Greece, New York v. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 4:50 am by John Mikhail
  Anticipating the theory later made famous by Justice Sutherland in United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
The Eastern District Court of New York did not delve too deeply into the question of causation, but it did conclude that “Regardless of the precise role played by defendants’ employees, the above-described operation of the Make-A-Tapes clearly evidences their commercial exploitation by defendants for profit in derogation of plaintiffs’ rights of exclusive publication. [read post]