Search for: "May v. IRS"
Results 1121 - 1140
of 2,792
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2024, 7:52 am
(In contrast, Mary McCord’s opening statement took a different view on how the majority’s opinion may apply to the IRS hypothetical: “The rationale of the majority’s decision would appear to apply to all departments and agencies. [read post]
23 Jun 2013, 9:30 pm
Similarly, under United States v. [read post]
3 Sep 2024, 3:34 pm
Savannah Shoals, LLC v. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 12:42 pm
; Starr v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 11:00 pm
According to a study released on May 25, 2020 by the Williams Institute on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law at UCLA , same-sex weddings have generated $3.8 billion in local and state economic activity in the United States since the Supreme Court legalized gay marriage five years ago this month in Obergefell v. [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 10:15 am
This is the first of three posts today on FTC v. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 5:54 pm
” Those with Expired Visas: Individuals whose DV-2020 visas have expired may not be issued replacement visas; however, individuals who received diversity visas in 2020 as a result of orders in the court case Gomez v. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 7:33 am
Hardin v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 2:26 pm
On August 3, 2009, in Doulgeris v. [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 12:40 pm
Readers are probably well familiar with Knight v. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
How is this relevant for California v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 8:33 am
Last week the Court issued its decision in United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 3:28 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 May 2020, 10:28 am
V 1993). [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 6:44 am
To the extent they are correct, the NFIB v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 3:08 pm
Saiba mais no Justiça na Manhã, nesta quinta-feira (09), a partir das 8 horas. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 2:08 pm
Saiba mais no Justiça na Manhã, nesta segunda-feira (06), a partir das 8 horas. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 6:37 am
IRS, the D.C. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 6:37 am
IRS, the D.C. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 9:58 am
No, as the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in Schlossberg v. [read post]