Search for: "May v. State" Results 1121 - 1140 of 119,415
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Paten v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 4:51 pm by Utah Criminal Defense Blog
In State of Utah v Brooks, Andrew Brooks appealed the district court’s decision to revoke and reinstate his probation and serve a minimum of 90 days in jail. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 4:48 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Nev.): 1 Complaint 1-1 Tribal Court of Appeals Opinion 8 Motion for Declaratory Judgment 10 DCT Order An excerpt: The Court DECLARES that the Tribe may assert criminal jurisdiction over any person qualifying as an Indian under the ICRA, as interpreted in cases such as United States v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 1:01 am
US_CLASSIFIED_COVERSHEETS.GIF In case involving the "extraordinary rendition program," Ninth Circuit reverses dismissal of civil action based on third party government intervenor's claim of state secrets privilege; judicial role, premised on Marbury v. [read post]
2 May 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Wednesday 3 May and Thursday 4 May, the Supreme Court will hear the appeal of P v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 11:41 am by John W. Arden
Although the laws require different evidence, the evidence was sufficient to state a claim under each law.The decision is Nelson v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 3:51 am
Employment-at-will status may be tempered by provisions in the employer’s policy manual or personnel handbook under certain conditionsPearce v Clinton Community College, 246 A.D.2d 775New York State is an “employment-at-will” state. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 7:34 am by Robert Black
On Monday, the first day of the new Supreme Court term, the Court heard argument in Kahler v. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 4:11 am
The State responds that the email met the elements of blackmail, which is not constitutionally protected speech, and may serve as the basis of a criminal conviction.Gerhart v. [read post]