Search for: "Mays v. Paul" Results 1121 - 1140 of 7,412
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2015, 10:26 am
Paul Levy, over at Public Citizen, has an interesting discussion of a recent decision by the Virginia Supreme Court in a case (Yelp v Hadeed Carpet Cleaning) involving the right to speak anonymously. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 4:34 am
Writ of mandamus granted compelling employer to pay retiree for accrued vacation creditsMatter of Sabatino v Suffolk County, 2010 NY Slip Op 04797, Decided on June 1, 2010, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentFrom July 3, 1984, until December 31, 2003, Paul Sabatino II served as Counsel to the Suffolk County Legislature. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 4:36 am by Broc Romanek
Just in time for the SEC’s 80th birthday (tomorrow is 80 years since the ’34 Act was signed into law), comes this news from Paul Weiss (we will be posting memos in our “SEC Enforcement” Practice Area): Yesterday, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued a significant decision in SEC v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 9:07 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
"  The panelists are Paul Cane of Paul Hastings LLP, Michael Rubin of Altshuler Berzon LLP, and Diane Sidd-Champion of McCarthy, Johnson & Miller Law Corporation. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 10:39 am
Paul T., 1999 NMSC 37, 128 N.M. 360, 993 P.2d 74, 78-79 (N.M. 1999) (violation of juvenile curfew ordinance); People v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 7:10 am by Joy
’s Elite, Is Sentenced to 4 to 12 Years in PrisonAmid Chaos, Alabama Lawmakers Delay Vote on Far-Reaching Abortion Ban Lynn Beyak suspended from Canadian Senate after refusing to take down letters condemned as racistA day after being reported missing, SCC Justice Gascon 'in good health,' family says Florida Judge rules 3-year-old must receive chemotherapy against parents' wishesSupreme Court of Canada says migrants can bring detention challenge to provincial… [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 9:30 am by Karen Tani
 While the ERA is a topic touched upon in college courses, it has been forgotten by generations of Americans who believe that the Fourteenth Amendment sufficiently addresses the rights of women, and that court precedent (such as Reed v Reed in 1971) and policies (such as Title VII, Title IX) protect their rights. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Supreme Court handed down its decision on the case McCleskey v. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 6:10 am by Eugene Volokh
And a university may not punish speech based on its allegedly racist content; see, e.g., Rosenberger v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 5:05 am by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
This post is from Royal Oak Attorney Paul Stablein's "Michigan Supreme Court Blog". [read post]