Search for: "Meanes v. State" Results 1121 - 1140 of 69,268
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2012, 9:30 pm
By Mike Dorf On Wednesday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Arizona v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 10:59 am by Jeralyn
BTD has noted the dissent of Justice Stevens in today's decision in McDonald v. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 7:58 am by Eugene R. Fidell
As readers who have not already made up their mind ponder what the verdict means for where (if anywhere, as that too is an option to some) the so-called "high value detainees" such as Khalid Sheikh Mohammed should be tried and who bears responsibility for what many view as an unsatisfying outcome despite the 20-years-to-life sentence Mr. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 5:16 am by Grace Capel
In other words, the Secretary of State cannot herself decide what statelessness means. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 3:24 am by Adam Wagner
It is capable of bearing several meanings and applying to many different types of behaviour. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 2:30 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
He appealed to the Supreme Court, asking it to depart from N v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] UKHL 31 by reference to the ECtHR decision in Paposhvili v Belgium [2017] Imm AR 867 and to remit his application for rehearing by reference to article 3. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 8:24 am by Steve Vladeck
United States was, as Evan Lee put it, “The Battle of the Canons,” the first argument in Torres v. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 10:51 am by The Federalist Society
On January 26, 2015, the Supreme Court issued its decision in M&G Polymers USA, LLC v. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 1:44 am by Jocelyn Hutton
In this post, Clare Montgomery KC of Matrix Chambers comments on the decision in Craig v Her Majesty’s Advocate (for the Government of the United States of America) and another (Scotland) [2022] UKSC 6. [read post]