Search for: "Owings v. Respondent" Results 1121 - 1140 of 2,317
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2015, 6:44 am by John Ehrett
§§2254(d)(1), (d)(2) and (e)(1), and the deference owed to trial court’s factual finding of juror bias required by Wainwright v. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 9:04 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The law is clear that, even when no original duty is owed to the plaintiff to undertake affirmative action, once it is voluntarily undertaken, it must be performed with due care. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 2:54 pm by Kirk Jenkins
Counsel answered that the Union’s position was that the State owed the full amount under the contract. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 3:25 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
The vote was a rare setback for LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual & Transgender) activists who had enjoyed recent success in both the legal and public opinion arenas, culminating in the June 28, 2015 Supreme Court opinion in Obergefell v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 3:08 pm by Carl Vennitti
Prior to July of 2003, V&V Enterprises, Inc., did business as Mauro Brand Products and been marketing and selling “pocket sandwiches” since coming under inspection by the USDA in 1991. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 11:30 am by John Elwood
§§ 2254(d)(1), (d)(2) and (e)(1), and the deference owed to trial court’s factual finding of juror bias,” and did not consider whether any such error is subject to harmless-error analysis. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 8:00 pm by John Ehrett
§§2254(d)(1), (d)(2) and (e)(1), and the deference owed to trial court’s factual finding of juror bias required by Wainwright v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 11:37 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  Tyson Foods responded, however, that the legal peace that is created when an employee is paid all the wages he or she is owed gives the company standing to object if the employee’s share of the judgment is reduced because of payments to employees who were not truly injured. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 8:57 am by John Elwood
§§2254(d)(1), (d)(2) and (e)(1), and the deference owed to trial court’s factual finding of juror bias,” and did not consider whether any such error is subject to harmless-error analysis. [read post]