Search for: "P Plaintiff"
Results 1121 - 1140
of 13,770
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2011, 7:46 am
P. 8(a). . . . [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 12:59 pm
Enlarge / Youth plaintiffs are greeted by supporters as they arrive for the nation's first youth climate change trial at Montana's First Judicial District Court on June 12, 2023. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 7:58 am
DeGuilio Referred To: Magistrate Judge Andrew P. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 8:57 am
YoungReferred To: Michael P. [read post]
8 Aug 2006, 2:35 am
P. 4(m).In Locklear, the Plaintiff, who was injured by a piece of equipment at work, filed a timely suit that incorrectly named the defendant manufacturer. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
P. 3 states that when process is issued but not served, a plaintiff must “continue the action by obtaining issuance of new process within one year from issuance of the previous process. [read post]
24 Dec 2020, 1:38 pm
From today's opinion by Judge Amit P. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 9:22 am
International Bhd. of Teamsters, Local 396, 174 Cal.App.2d 184, 188-189, 344 P.2d 25 (1959) where an employee was fired for not testifying falsely. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 6:57 am
It claimed a “[p]roduce capacity of over 5000 BRBs per year. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 9:01 pm
The plaintiff was pro se. [read post]
5 May 2014, 1:26 pm
Cotton with a per curiam opinion (beginning on p. 13) holding that the lower courts failed to view the facts in the light most favorable to the plaintiff in granting the § 1983 defendant summary judgment (the case involved a police shooting). [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 9:26 pm
The court found that the plaintiff’s expert’s opinion was inappropriate “since [the doctor's] conclusions were premised on an incomplete history of plaintiff’s medical [...] [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 1:49 pm
At issue is whether the Prop. 8 plaintiffs have standing to defend the measure when state officials won’t do so. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 2:43 pm
Term 2d Dept. 2010) “In opposition to plaintiff’s motion and in support of its cross motion for summary judgment, defendant submitted the affirmation of a partner in the law firm retained by defendant to conduct plaintiff’s EUO. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 9:24 pm
Although plaintiff submitted [...] [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 4:51 pm
Term 2d Dept. 2012) “The affidavit plaintiff submitted in opposition to defendant’s motion was insufficient to establish that plaintiff had responded to defendant’s verification requests since the affiant failed to state who had allegedly provided responses to defendant’s verification requests, [...] [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 6:33 pm
., 2012 NY Slip Op 02597 (1st Dept. 2012) Plaintiff in a 5102(d) action must prove that (s)he was cut off from no-fault and that (s)he had an inability to pay the ensuing medical bills… “Plaintiff’s accident occurred on April 8, 2007 and he underwent arthroscopic surgery on his right [...] [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 5:03 pm
Plaintiff Grewal filed a defamation action. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 12:21 pm
“The record establishes that plaintiff’s responses to defendant’s [...] [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 5:54 pm
Term 2d Dept. 2012) “Plaintiff’s objections regarding the EUO requests should not have been considered by the Civil Court, as plaintiff does not allege that its assignor had responded in any way to defendant’s EUO requests. [read post]
