Search for: "P. v. Case"
Results 1121 - 1140
of 25,677
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2023, 10:59 pm
When a couple decides to end their marriage, several legal and financial issues must be resolved. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 12:13 pm
And Napear v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 11:19 am
The case of Alvarez v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
These U.S. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 6:56 pm
Because this is an arms ban case, the court should have applied the common-use test required by the Supreme Court in District of Columbia v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 2:36 pm
Case Name: Ronda Gaines v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 2:02 pm
Google LLC, case number 6:21-cv-00569 in the U.S. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 11:24 am
” (p. 13). [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
Entrenchment or Extension of Dominance The draft Merger Guidelines resurrected a theory of anticompetitive harm largely seen in cases in the 1960s and 1970s—entrenchment or extension of a dominant position. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 3:11 pm
Co. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 3:00 am
Co., 44 P.3d 663 (Utah 2002). [read post]
22 Jul 2023, 8:23 am
Such was the case in Flatiron-Lane v. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 3:59 am
—Abraham Lincoln 1Sling v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 8:44 am
U.S. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:37 am
Author ERab123 Licence CC BY-SA 4.0 Source Wikimedia Commons Jane LambertCourt of Appeal (Sir Andrew McFarlane P, Lord Justice Arnold and Lady Justice Elisabeth Laing) JC Bamford Excavators Ltd v Manitou UK Ltd and another [2023] EWCA Civ 840 (17 July 2023)This is an important case on the law of confidence and trade secrets as well as Patent Court Practice. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Moreover, while petitioner argues that the majority of justices in this court have found that respondents' policy was arbitrary and capricious and that she is the victim of "the unfortunate arbitrary and capricious assignment of her case to a Judge in the City of New York" who ruled otherwise (NYSCEF 66, p. 7), not only are the other courts' decisions not binding on me, but petitioner does not acknowledge the cases wherein the vaccination policy was… [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Moreover, while petitioner argues that the majority of justices in this court have found that respondents' policy was arbitrary and capricious and that she is the victim of "the unfortunate arbitrary and capricious assignment of her case to a Judge in the City of New York" who ruled otherwise (NYSCEF 66, p. 7), not only are the other courts' decisions not binding on me, but petitioner does not acknowledge the cases wherein the vaccination policy was… [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 5:39 am
From Doe v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 1:25 am
The seminal case, Tampa Maid Seafood Products v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 11:50 pm
” (Id., at p. 941.) [read post]
