Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US"
Results 1121 - 1140
of 4,572
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2020, 10:32 pm
Last week the Munich I Regional Court's press office confirmed to me that the Nokia v. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 4:10 pm
However, if an employee uses the paid EPSL during this time, the regulations appear to limit the employer’s authority to require the use of accrued leave because it is otherwise considered a paid leave. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 2:31 am
Reliance on force majeure When considering the impact of a particular event on the ability of a party to perform its obligations, there are a number of matters which the parties will need to consider (noting that the precise application will always turn on the drafting of the provision): Was the party prevented, hindered or delayed (depending on the construction of the clause) from performing the contract because of the relevant event? [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 2:30 pm
V Dean E. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 4:59 am
Hart v. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 7:03 am
The post Redbox’s Terms of Use Fail (OUCH)–Wilson v. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 4:23 pm
These are precisely the types of laws that the Supreme Court overturned in District of Columbia v. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 6:03 pm
McCormick v. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 5:54 pm
In Cajun Conti LLC v. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 1:03 pm
Supreme Court’s South Dakota v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 6:56 am
On Feb. 9, the Israeli Supreme Court handed down its judgement in Katz v. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 5:00 am
The same standard applies to the president. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 1:58 am
Broadcom (in support of neither party) and in Thryv v. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 10:10 am
Dean v. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 1:53 am
Dr Mateo Aboy (University of Cambridge) discussed whether recent case law is ‘good’ for precision medicine with an empirical analysis of patent judgments in the US and Europe. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 12:16 pm
In the afternoon roundtable, one participant claimed that Hassell v. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 9:03 pm
In fact, the available evidence supports precisely the opposite prediction. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 6:00 am
Circuit decided Committee on the Judiciary v. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 3:19 am
The court can award a 100% uplift on those damages, using the Walmsley v Education Limited [2014] IPEC case where that uplift was treated as a standard royalty in the industry for reproduction of photographs without attribution. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 10:29 am
In fairness to the court of appeals, this is a known problem of using “controversial” as a standard in a lawsuit over compelled commercial speech, where there is by definition a controversy. [read post]
