Search for: "PROFESSORS OF SECOND AMENDMENT LAW" Results 1121 - 1140 of 4,985
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2024, 12:00 pm by Guest Author
Second, judge-shopping creates a perception of partiality that undermines the legitimacy and credibility of the courts. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 10:33 am by corynne mcsherry
After months of waiting, a Ninth Circuit panel has finally responded to Google's plea, supported by public interest groups (including EFF), journalists, librarians, other service providers, and law professors, to reconsider its disastrous opinion in the case of Garcia v. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 11:44 am by Randy Barnett
Professor Ledewitz would have “us” change the laws in ways that “make sense” to “us. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 1:39 pm
Earlier: Boston College Law Professor In Anti-Gay Marriage Ad BC Law Prof. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
” And yet there is no clear statement by the Colazzo court that the decision in the case is grounded on independent Illinois law.A second interesting feature of the case becomes plain when we examine the merits of the Republicans’ claim. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 8:00 am by Katie Keith
Katie Keith is an associate research professor at Georgetown University’s Health Policy Institute and an adjunct professor at Georgetown University Law Center. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 7:38 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Although Professor Bamzai's position did not prevail, his work is discussed extensively by the Court (something us fellow law professors think is really cool). [read post]
Ricketts’ second and final term as governor expires in January 2023, and there is rampant speculation that he himself is interested in serving in the U.S. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:17 am by Jeff Welty
The heart of the position description is below: The School is seeking a tenure-track professor to specialize in criminal law and procedure. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 4:20 am by SHG
Of course, as with every defense win in Fourth Amendment law, some will criticize the opinion for not going far enough. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 6:30 am by Mark Graber
Cycles is nevertheless a work by a law professor well read in other disciplines rather than a study by a scholar who stands above the disciplinary fray. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 6:19 am by Andrew Appel
Professor Eugene Volokh has analyzed “Three ways of thinking about [restrictions on distributing software in a First-Amendment context]: 1. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 7:49 am by Randy Barnett
On his blog, Dorf on Law, Cornell law professor Michael Dorf has a very thoughtful and measured assessment of The Stakes of the Originalism/Texualism Debate. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 9:35 am by Randy Barnett
Heller, which restored a previously lost clause of the Constitution: the Second Amendment. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 8:47 am by David Kopel
I filed an amicus brief in support of petition, on behalf of professors (including VC's Randy Barnett) who teach Second Amendment law, and also on behalf of several civil rights organizations (the Independence Institute, where I work; the Millennial Policy Center; and Mountain States Legal Foundation). [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 4:56 am by Timothy P. Flynn
This is a guest post from Wayne State Law Professor Robert Sedler who, from time to time, breaks down the constitutional aspects of some of the weighty cases we follow over here at the Law Blogger.The United States Supreme Court is considering two cases presenting constitutional challenges to bans on same sex marriage. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Stevens Professor of Law at Cornell University and co-author, most recently, of Beating Hearts: Abortion and Animal Rights. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 5:00 am by Guest Blogger
  This unprecedented constitutional moment will arrive very soon.David Marcus is Professor of Law at the University of Arizona Rogers College of Law. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 1:00 pm by Lawrence Solum
” The Court chose not to delineate “the full scope of the Second Amendment,” and also “declin[ed] to establish a level of scrutiny for evaluating Second Amendment restrictions. [read post]