Search for: "Parker v Parker"
Results 1121 - 1140
of 2,343
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2016, 8:07 am
Benefiting from an intervening Supreme Court ruling decided in 2015, Young v. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 7:34 am
Like this one.The case is McFadden v. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 7:06 am
The case is Mustafa v. [read post]
31 Mar 2013, 11:35 am
Parker, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2013, 11:35 am
Parker, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2024, 6:34 am
Except that in Section 1983 cases, an unsuccessful motion to dismiss on qualified immunity grounds may be appealed immediately.The case is Pal v. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 9:06 am
Tepperwien v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 6:05 am
In 2013, the Second Circuit held in Rasamen v. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 10:11 am
It cites Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 3:56 am
Here, plaintiff’s allegation that Bellinson’s advice denied him the full value of his malpractice suit against Pepperman was “purely conclusory” (Murray Hill Invs. v Parker Chapin Flattau & Klimpl, LLP, 305 AD2d 228, 229 [1st Dept 2003]). [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 3:30 am
As the IAS court found, the allegations underlying plaintiff’s malpractice claim were couched in terms of “gross speculations” about future events, without the requisite factual basis to support the allegation (see Phillips-Smith Specialty Retail Group II v Parker Chapin Flattau & Klimpl, 265 AD2d 208, 210 [1st Dept 1999], lv denied 94 NY2d 759 [2000]). [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 9:24 am
Parker, 322 N.C. 559, 566, 369 S.E.2d 596, 600 (1988). [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 6:54 pm
Parker, No. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 11:59 am
This holding effectively reinstates the “no duty” doctrine in Texas, which the Court had abolished nearly forty years ago in Parker v. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 4:29 am
[Summarized by Melissa Parker] [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 6:48 am
Reporting on the Supreme Court's Nov. 28th decision in In Aaron Reid v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 10:19 am
Yesterday's Daily Journal had a story (no link available) by Laura Ernde on Monday's Supreme Court ruling in Clayworth v. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 1:41 pm
As the Court of Appeals stated in People v. [read post]
17 May 2007, 12:16 pm
Today, the Wall Street Journal has this editorial on the bill that amends the law at issue in the Davenport v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 7:53 am
" Champion Laboratories, Inc. v. [read post]
