Search for: "Parker v. Parker"
Results 1121 - 1140
of 2,550
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2014, 5:06 am
Parker v. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 8:01 pm
” Parker v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 5:05 am
In the case, the court recalled the Supreme Court’s Parker v. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 10:04 am
Here is how the Court of Appeals (Parker, Livingston and Droney) sums it up:In District of Columbia v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 8:54 am
Here: Nebraska Opening Brief Tribe Brief US Brief Reply Brief TK Lower court materials and links to prior iterations of this case here. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 8:59 am
On utility payments the FTT had again not followed Parker v Waller. [read post]
4 Jul 2014, 4:10 am
Parker v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 9:16 am
The case is Parker v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 7:41 am
The answer, at least on the outset, is not an obvious one, but was faced by the United Kingdom Court of Appeals over a decade ago.The case in question is 1-800 Flowers Inc v Phonenames Ltd, decided in the very first year of the second millennium, which dealt with the phone number "800-FLOWERS", registered in the US as a trademark in the mid 1980s by the company 800-Flowers Inc. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 6:10 am
It is styled, Crocker v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 12:31 am
Following the Bilski v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:00 am
Diehr, Parker v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 12:51 pm
Prometheus); (2) using a mathematical formula to adjust alarm limits for certain operating conditions in a catalytic conversion process (Parker v. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 12:39 pm
In it, was a notification about “civil purge court” in the case of Parker v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 7:04 am
Citing dicta from various Supreme Court decisions, the Second Circuit (Parker, Hall and Matsumoto [D.J.]) notes that the High Court has made passing reference over the years about the legality of this slogan. [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 6:34 am
The case is styled, Hodges v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 6:00 am
Parker & Allstate Prop. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 8:43 am
Parker Frey is 10 years old. [read post]
26 May 2014, 12:00 pm
Benson, 409 U.S. 63, 67-68 (1972); Parker v. [read post]
25 May 2014, 11:08 am
In Parker v District of Columbia, banning from the home the most preferred firearm in the nation to keep and use for protection of one's home and family would fail constitutional muster. [read post]
