Search for: "People v Johnson" Results 1121 - 1140 of 2,761
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2015, 3:33 pm by Richard M. Re
McMillan expressly “derived” their subjective standard “from one articulated by Judge Friendly in Johnson v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
 This claim is, of course, deeply counterintuitive, and it would be very awkward, to say the least, for the Supreme Court to explain to the American people that Section 3 doesn’t apply to someone who’s been President because although that person held an “office,” it wasn’t an office “of the United States. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 1:31 am by INFORRM
The story detailed how the NSF offers attendance at lunches and VIP events with the treasurer to people who pay membership fees of up to $22,000. [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
Held, the natural and ordinary meaning of the words complained of are that Mr Sivananthan misled or misinformed Boris Johnson, then campaigning for election as Prime Minister, causing Mr Johnson to refer in his letter to ‘deepening ties’ with Sri Lanka. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 12:42 pm by Giles Peaker
I accept the submission, made by Mr Johnson, that advantage in some other respect, does not remedy indirect discrimination. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 12:07 pm
But apparently, people do not know this. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 5:33 am
The wake was public knowledge and there were many people there, including all of his family. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 1:52 am by INFORRM
On the same day, Johnson J heard the trial in the case of Shafi v New Vision TV Limited and another QB-2021-00443.6 On 4 to 8 December 2023 HHJ Parkes KC heard the trial in the case of Wilson v Mendelsohn and others QB-2021-002673. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 2:38 pm by John Elwood
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. and North Carolina Farm Bureau Federation v. [read post]
15 Sep 2018, 9:17 am by Randy Barnett
Johnson quote, which I read yesterday as the guiding light for the lower court judges and all judges. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 2:53 am by INFORRM
The Press Complaints Commission resolved complaints by Ms Jessica Antunes v Evening Standard, and by Joanne Swan v The Sun In the Courts On Monday 16 July 2012, Tugendhat J heard and gave judgment in applications in the case of Crow v Johnson ([2012] EWHC 1982 (QB)) ­– dismissing the libel claim brought by the General Secretary of the RMT against the London Mayor. [read post]