Search for: "People v Word" Results 1121 - 1140 of 17,904
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2009, 1:46 am
Also, note the use of the word 'likely'.]On the factsThe defendants had created a link, they had done so for commercial advantage and had done so with the intention of creating a link. [read post]
27 May 2022, 7:49 am by Eric Goldman
In other words, if Salesforce is legally compelled to tell Backpage how to run its content moderation function, then Salesforce is being cast into the publisher role. [read post]
7 Aug 2016, 3:43 am by SHG
As we made clear in Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 9:30 pm by ernst
What word of FDR's Court-packing plan, you ask? [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 11:55 am by Eugene Volokh
” And indeed the rules of conduct limit the ban on “offensive, disgusting or insulting” language to speech thattends to create or incite, or creates or incites, an immediate breach of peace, including ... personally abusive epithets, or words or language of an offensive, disgusting or insulting nature, which epithets, words or language when addressed to the ordinary citizen are, as a matter of common knowledge, inherently likely to provoke a violent reaction of… [read post]
1 May 2007, 1:37 pm
These cases are reviewed below: People v Newton, 2007 NY Slip Op 03754 - "No Means No" The defendant was charged with, inter alia, sodomy in the third degree (Penal Law § 130.40[3]). [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 7:32 am
Particularly when read in combination with the Ninth Amendment's declaration of the retained rights of the people, these twin assertions of popular sovereignty established a rule of strict construction - the very interpretive principle rejected by John Marshall in McCulloch v. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 8:43 am by Eric Goldman
He then worked to boost the posts’ visibility, including: the posts asked users to “follow [his] link and mark it as helpful so that the message is amplified and as many people are warned as possible. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 6:23 am by Joy Waltemath
When asked who was expressing concern, she testified that she had heard this from “people on the street” and “people leaving a voice mail. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 2:05 pm by Parks, Chesin & Walbert
When people hear the word “discrimination,” they may often associate it with historically marginalized groups, like people of color, women, LGBT+ people, and so forth. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 7:01 am by Eric Goldman
” In other words, they sought to establish (using centuries-old chattel-based theft doctrines rather than trademark law) that a trademark owner has the unrestricted right to shut down anyone using their trademarks, even if no consumers are harmed. [read post]