Search for: "People v. Cross"
Results 1121 - 1140
of 5,671
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2020, 7:29 am
(Cross-posted from Human Rights at Home blog, here)I suppose we are meant to be grateful for the Court’s opinion recognizing that discrimination against gay, lesbian and trangender people is sex discrimination under Title VII, as Andrew Koppelman explained a generation ago and discusses in a July 10th post here. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 9:10 am
People who are convicted of federal drug crimes typically serve significant time behind bars. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 9:10 am
People who are convicted of federal drug crimes typically serve significant time behind bars. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 9:44 am
This post is cross-posted on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 5:23 am
” In United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 6:38 am
That does define hearsay, but people may not realize that even explosive hearsay is suspect because you cannot cross-examine it. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 6:15 am
"Respondent cannot rely on the fact that its goods could have been purchased by people who reside out of state. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 12:38 pm
Illinois Post-Conviction Relief and People v. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 4:42 pm
The case of Richard Burgon MP v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 7:26 pm
Supreme Court's ruling last month in Kennedy v. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 2:28 am
Hinojosa, disappointed his fighter lost, began challenging other people there to a fight. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 2:44 am
If Oracle v. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 8:59 am
” McAllister v. [read post]
1 Jan 2008, 8:23 am
People v. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 1:00 pm
State v. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 7:39 pm
Under the Supreme Court’s decision in Maryland v. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 7:39 pm
Under the Supreme Court’s decision in Maryland v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 3:49 am
The district court held an evidentiary hearing at which Soto testified and was cross-examined. [read post]
9 May 2014, 5:32 pm
For a discussion, take a look at People v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 11:54 am
The ruling came in a lawsuit, Alasaad v. [read post]
