Search for: "People v. Mike" Results 1121 - 1140 of 1,512
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2010, 9:10 am
By Sherry Colb In my FindLaw column for this week, I discuss Kentucky v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 4:08 am by Legal Beagle
However SLAB rejected all arguments the case was not just about money, but was a matter of huge public interest, and that the action also sought an order to prohibit the future imposition of overdraft charges under s 140B of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.Reported on the Govan Law Centre’s own blog, the GLC's Principal Solicitor, Mike Dailly said: "Govan Law Centre believes the Scottish Legal Aid Board has dealt a death blow to tens of thousands of people in Scotland… [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 7:39 pm by Kevin Funnell
In fact, who can forget Chief Justice Roberts' famous edict in the majority opinion in Madonna v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 6:24 am by James Bickford
”  In the New York Times, Adam Liptak discusses the book review, as does Mike Dorf of Dorf on Law. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 4:02 am by Philip Thomas
Ironically, most people credit Florida attorney Willie Gary for that verdict even though he avoided the fee dispute. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 1:59 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
This faulty reasoning shows up in the district court opinion in Salinger v. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 10:57 am by Steve Hall
" The two bandied about other issues, including Brown v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 8:09 pm
By Mike Dorf My latest FindLaw column attempts to unpack what's at stake in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 8:18 pm
By Mike Dorf Federal district courts have recently taken action on gay rights on three fronts: (1) Perry v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 8:04 am by Stephen Albainy-Jenei
At BlawgIT, Brett Trout writes about the AMP v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 9:26 am
By Mike Dorf Update: I was talking about regulation of the virtual reality of the future on NPR's Marketplace yesterday. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 5:32 am by Robert Ambrogi
Mike leaving the Wikimedia Foundation is a confidential personnel issue, and the Wikimedia Foundation doesn’t talk about confidential personnel issues with anyone except the people directly involved. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 5:27 pm by Mike Keating
This law was made clear in the case Rhoades v. [read post]