Search for: "People v. Roberts"
Results 1121 - 1140
of 6,789
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2024, 12:58 pm
Supreme Court issued its decision in Counterman v. [read post]
3 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
This past term, Roberts joined the majority in Bostock v. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 3:50 am
"The Appellate Division disagreed, holding that the County was under no contractual obligation to provide [Handy] with health insurance and, accordingly, it did not act arbitrarily or capriciously in terminating that benefit.The Handy decision should be contrasted with two other retiree benefits cases: Della Rocco v City of Schenectady and Andriano v City of Schenectady.The Schenectady cases differed in that they concerned executive action as opposed to legislative action and… [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 4:14 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 10:04 am
Ten people were sickened and three died. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 5:53 pm
The case is U.S. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 9:01 am
We had seen this before in some past Confrontation Clause cases, such as Hammon v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 7:57 am
S., at 548 (ROBERTS, C. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 2:52 am
People v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 5:02 am
In NFIB v. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 3:30 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Loving v. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 1:25 pm
They no doubt aim here at the reliance by federal courts upon Romer v. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 11:09 am
The People, November 9, 2006.In UMG v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 2:29 pm
Roberts announces that Alito has the opinion in Tennessee Wine and Spirits Retailers Association v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 8:17 am
Co. v. 563 Grand Medical, PC a/a/o Robert Alford(Sup. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 3:47 pm
From Lasche v. [read post]
5 May 2009, 10:25 am
Breyer, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 11:17 am
Caperton v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 11:07 am
There are lots of other people who are already inclined to do so. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 7:10 am
This concept is being challenged again in Ball v. [read post]